Aerosoft Schiphol(EHAM)

[Hugo346 13]

I have been informed by reliable source that both FS9 and FSX-version will be released together.That is good news for everybody.Rob de BakkerDirector Ivao Netherlands

Great news!+73 nevertheless.

[SamMillar 17]

Sorry to bump but I'm sure you'll appreciate another vote! +74!!

[nukemc 0]

+75 (FSuX) FS9 - rules!!!

[Guest knarfage]

+76I tried to use Cloud9's Schipol and it didn't work, didn't even get anyone there who cared about the problem I was having between their software and my game, which all other free and payware airports worked. So the prospect of seeing this airport come to life for FS9 I'd pay whatever it takes. The NL2000 version was some nice pics.Count me in fella's !!!!!

[Swoop 0]

+77Let's ask them if they would kindly re-do Cloud9 KLAX while they're at it. The Cloud9 version is very detailed but has texture issues at times. A little lighter texture would be nice, while still keeping the detail of the airport. Mark

[dick32 0]

here is +60Dick HeerlenI mean 78

[fwerff 70]

+79

[Guest ianrivaldosmith]

80

[Fido 0]

+81 :(

[F.Alonso22 4]

+82and I prefer x-plane than fsx version

[tipitout 5]

+83I tried Cloud9. It was little more than a slideshow on my ageing system. All my Aerosoft sceneries give me acceptable framerates. I have FSX, but had to uninstall it for the usual reasons, and I'm not upgrading my system anytime soon. Payware developers take note: you had better continue to produce high quality add-ons for FS9 if you want any money out of me in the next several years.Philip Dawson

[iainsmith 9]

+84I'd certainly buy it for FS9. I love flying into and out of good quality add-on airports. :( Iain Smith

[G7USL 117]

All my freinds at the www.swfsg.co.uk want this too? This boost's it to +136, thank you. ;)

[MorsAbAlto 19]

+137 :(

[ecagan 0]

+138Eric