I run my flight sim @ max AA and AF, so its not my computer. But this is what i get :(Image deleted, over the 200K files size limit

Hi,I would try the Soft Horizons sky textures package by John Cillis.You should be able to find it in the flightsim library.

Its not the horizon, its water rendering. You see, its not sky light blue its still water, I just have this huge edgy rendered/unrendered area following me

Do what Onur said. R-

My horison is smooth already. I dont need any smooth horizons. ANd it does nothing for my water. Water, ground only renders for like 100miles and everything else looks blurry

This is a FS9 limitation. Some water addons present it more visible, some less. The fact is, its there on every system. I for one get by it by limiting visibility to 30nm, which is more or less real world limitation in many situations...

How would u do it, if sight distance is max 60 miles? Could u help me set it to 30?Thanks Word Not Allowed,Spasibo and Danke :)

Hello,Soft Horizons sky textures package by John Cillis.Good advice and simple solution.....Regards.

This is a FS9 limitation. Some water addons present it more visible, some less. The fact is, its there on every system. I for one get by it by limiting visibility to 30nm, which is more or less real world limitation in many situations...

Bullcrap! It's not a limitation.It's how you have everything configured to run together. Crazy at its seems there is a proper order to install addons.(Unfortunatly I can't discuss that because of the NDA)I posted screens on the temp forum after someone said the same thing about "Limitations"And i'll post them here. Later when I'm home.2 things I'll suggest. SOFT HORIZONS!!!And check your Detail1.bmp in your world texture folder. Some addons replace this file and that is the result you get.

Bullcrap! It's not a limitation.It's how you have everything configured to run together. Crazy at its seems there is a proper order to install addons.(Unfortunatly I can't discuss that because of the NDA)I posted screens on the temp forum after someone said the same thing about "Limitations"And i'll post them here. Later when I'm home.2 things I'll suggest. SOFT HORIZONS!!!And check your Detail1.bmp in your world texture folder. Some addons replace this file and that is the result you get.

OK, I am very interested in your proof. For the record, you are the one who is wrong. It has been proven too many times.

I run my flight sim @ max AA and AF, so its not my computer. But this is what i get :(

I'll also add. That everything cranked to the right and running Full AA & AF doesn't mean anything!!You need to find a balance that makes your sim look great. Not just Maxing out everything.

OK, I am very interested in your proof. For the record, you are the one who is wrong. It has been proven too many times.

Fine, Give me a screen shot with this effect and i'll match it.The only time I get a hint of this is in the Dusk transition.

Soft horizon definitely lessens that effect but it is an fs9 limitations. The reason why on your computer it doesn't look good at dusk/dawn is because those are the times that the soft horizon textures aren't showing up properly, as it says in the readme file for it. I have looked into this issue many many times and have never seen an example from the few people that claim that their fs9 doesn't have rendering boundaries visible, although I'd love for you to prove me wrong and show me how ofcourse :(

Bullcrap! It's not a limitation.It's how you have everything configured to run together. Crazy at its seems there is a proper order to install addons.(Unfortunatly I can't discuss that because of the NDA)I posted screens on the temp forum after someone said the same thing about "Limitations"And i'll post them here. Later when I'm home.2 things I'll suggest. SOFT HORIZONS!!!And check your Detail1.bmp in your world texture folder. Some addons replace this file and that is the result you get.

NDA? ... Anyways, I second this. I had this same problem and was part of the discussion in the temp forum. I checked the detail1.bmp and it was ok. I then worked with the add-on Flight Environment to give an ocean texture that better matched, and a different horizon.Another thing I did was to change the settings in FS9 that my terrain detail was Land only and Water was Low. I did this because the untextured water in the distance was receiving the wave effects and it looked aweful. It looked like scaled up wave effects and it runed the look.Right now it is all fine. I have not installed Soft Horizons yet, but I mean to.So far i have the 1) FlightEnviron. Add-on and 2) FS9 Terrain settings tweeked to help reduce this effect.

I never said it didn't look good.I said I get a "hint" of rendering boundariesLike they always say.Proof is in the Pudding.Images over the 200K file size limit deleted

For the record, you are the one who is wrong. It has been proven too many times.

Comments always welcome

Ah, The Deafening Silence.Funny how it is when I've finally proving myself right, That the thread just dies.I'm just curious as to where Word Not Allowed's claim that

For the record, you are the one who is wrong. It has been proven too many times.

fits in now?Please tell me what this proves?