Hi Shane. If my 3000000000 is 3GB wouldn't your 104857600 be just over 1GB and not 100MB like you have there?

Your 300000000 has 9 digits and 104857600 is 8 digits long. So you have 30 X a higher number.

Your 300000000 has 9 digits and 104857600 is 8 digits long. So you have 30 X a higher number.

Jack C had posted 3000000000, that is 3 billion, not 300 million. This figure is in bytes. 3 billion bytes would be 3GB. My number of 104857600 is in bytes, which translates to 100MB.

I had a similar problem initially. I started trying tweaks to the cfg... no go.What fixed it?Turn off your cpu hyperthreading in your bios and test with a clean cfg.Now I have great fsx performance with no tweaks except for highmemfix (which I've never tested without) and the hideinfo text.

Your 300000000 has 9 digits and 104857600 is 8 digits long. So you have 30 X a higher number.

HEHE. Dont you hate that when you have too many zeros and your eyes lose track of how many zeros you have. woops!

HEHE. Dont you hate that when you have too many zeros and your eyes lose track of how many zeros you have. woops!

Very difficult to keep track.

Your 300000000 has 9 digits and 104857600 is 8 digits long. So you have 30 X a higher number.

I think I may be on some funny stuff or something but doesn't 1 0 4 8 5 7 6 0 0 have 9 digits as well?

I think I may be on some funny stuff or something but doesn't 1 0 4 8 5 7 6 0 0 have 9 digits as well?

The original 3000000000 has 10 digits (unlike the later typo), 104857600 has 9, but the conclusion about the former being 30x bigger than the latter was pretty close. ;-)Pete

The original 3000000000 has 10 digits (unlike the later typo), 104857600 has 9, but the conclusion about the former being 30x bigger than the latter was pretty close. ;-)Pete

Well I got something right !!!!