audiohavoc

My recommendation is to not use FSUIPC for the yoke or rudder, reset the calibration for your controls to default in Windows, and set the sensitivity to 50% in FSX for your yoke and rudder. It flies very nicely for me following this procedure. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Just like the NGX, ifmyou turn the battery on, then press and hold the "MENU" key on a CDU forma few seconds, the CDU will turn on. Then you can use it to connect ground power. Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 4

Add to that: - automatic time compression to drastically reduce cruise time for long hauls - winds aloft data can be imported from Active Sky directly to the FMC - a huge amount of customizable airline options that can be changed in real time via the CDU's - ground services, push back, refuelling, loading, and realistic, adjustable ground turnaround procedures all via the CDU's - Incredible textures and modeling inside and out, as expected they are vastly improved when compared to the Level D 767 - service based failures, with adjustable wear rate - automated livery installer - cargo version Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 4

Screenshots, or better yet, video would certainly help. Also, unless you have eliminated all variables and have concrete evidence to support your claims, you have nothing acceptable to support your claims that the issue is caused by PMDG. I work as an engineer, and I have to troubleshoot technical issues on a regular basis. I will not make a claim with certainty unless I can provide evidence to support my claim. Just a suggestion, take it or leave it. Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 4

The manuals supplied with the aircraft are the actual Boeing documents, and therefore are protected by copyright law. That is why they are locked and not printable. Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 4

No problem, PMDG did the same thing with the NGX, FYI. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Turn the batteries on, then hold down the Menu key on one of the CDUs, after a few seconds it should come alive. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Thanks for taking the time to offer these suggestions! I will give some of them a try. Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk 4

It hasn't been years, the PMDG 777 has been in developement for only around 18 months.

Thank you for the response!

A few questions if I may: 1. Is there a discount for prior TOPCAT owners, or is the VATSIM discount the only offer? 2. Is it possible to run PFPX and TOPCAT on a second, networked computer, separate from the computer running FSX?

And it only took what, like 1.5 years of development? I think that is the quickest product timeline so far for PMDG. All the "what's taking so long" , "just release it already", and "its taking forever" folks just got a reality check. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

I am a sucker for for authentic, "study-sim" products such as those from PMDG, A2A, VRS, Majestic, etc. In the case of Milviz, their products are quite a bit cheaper, but still deliver a very satisfying product, especially with the flight dynamics, sounds, and visuals. To compare their 737 to the NGX isn't fair IMO. The NGX took much longer to produce, and costs around $20 more, so I would expect the NGX to have some aspects that are different when compared to the Milviz 737. Anyways, I really like this aircraft and at least Milviz is responsive and willing to finish the product. I know this was a huge undertaking for Milviz, but I hope they do well enough with this product to make it worth making more airliners. They could make a 707, 727, 747-200, L-1011, or DC-10 since none of these have been done for FSX to the level of Milviz quality. Military wise, a C-130 or C-5 would also be great. I hope this 737 does not remain the first and only airliner from Milviz. Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk HD

The NGX gets higher fps fore me as well. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Android. Sent from my GT-N8013 using Tapatalk HD