Genial Álex, pásalo bien :( Hasta luego

Alex,Very good spanish.I have got an utility from Asus, named TurboV. With it I increase the BCLK Frecuency from 130 to 140 MHz. With that the clock frecuency is increased from 3073 MHz to 3227 MHz.Till now it seems to work fine and the CPU temperature don´t exceeds 70ºC.Dario(compatriota)I already have installed the last version of Barajas Airport In any case thanks a lot.

I already have installed the last version of Barajas Airport In any case thanks a lot.

Oh, ok hehe. So it's not only in Barajas that you get poor frame rates? Then it must be some of your settings are bringing FSX to it's knees. Overclocking will help for sure, but you should be getting better FPS than that even on stock clocks.Can you post your FSX and nVidia Inspector settings please?Saludos Francisco :(

A correction The temperature don't exceeds 80ªC. It is between 70º/75ªC.In the last post I didn't put my firm. Excuse me.Francisco Mateos

I have a question for everyone. When I fly MSFSX with the PMDG MD11, for example, in a heavy airport, per example Aerosoft Mega Airport Madrid, I don't get more than 6 / 10 FPS.My configuration is basically:Motherboard: Asus P6T Deluxe V2.CPU: QuadCore Intel Core i7 950, 3200 MHz (24 x 133)Graphics Card: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 - Driver version 8.17.12.6658 - nVIDIA ForceWare 66.58 - Memory size 1536MBRAM: 8GB (4x2) DDR3 Kingston 9905403-011.A03LFWhere do you think is the bottleneck?I am looking to buy a more powerful processor.Could you give me some idea to improve FPS?PD: I have configured the graphic Card with the NvidiaInspector fllowin the advise of Ryan MaziarzThanks in advance and excuse my poor english.Francisco Mateos

As mentioned, an overclock of the CPU to around 4GHz on air should see a massive improvement. But why are you using 8Gb (4X2) on a triple channel board? You should be using multiples of 3 to get the triple channel set up...Odd set up for a triple channel board...Andrew

But why are you using 8Gb (4X2) on a triple channel board? You should be using multiples of 3 to get the triple channel set up...Odd set up for a triple channel board...Andrew

Actually with that configuration he has the lower 6GB in tripple channel and the upper 2GB in single channel, if all three channels are populated

Sandy Bridge processors were never designed to be, nor ever will be a "gaming" processor. The clock speeds achieved may be higher at the moment, but look at the surrounding hardware as well. The Intel X68 chipset does not support SLI in x16, x16 configuration for example. (32 lanes are physically available, but mainboard manufacturers configure the boards to have an x16, x8, x1 layout.) Nor does it support triple channel memory. The onboard graphics processor makes overclocking difficult without a "K" edition processor as well.So, while the CPU benchmark results may in fact better some of the Gulftown's at stock speeds, on the whole the system will be slower than a comperably equipped X58 system. And this is coming from a guy still on a 790i rig!

Sandy Bridge processors were never designed to be, nor ever will be a "gaming" processor. The clock speeds achieved may be higher at the moment, but look at the surrounding hardware as well. The Intel X68 chipset does not support SLI in x16, x16 configuration for example. (32 lanes are physically available, but mainboard manufacturers configure the boards to have an x16, x8, x1 layout.) Nor does it support triple channel memory. The onboard graphics processor makes overclocking difficult without a "K" edition processor as well.So, while the CPU benchmark results may in fact better some of the Gulftown's at stock speeds, on the whole the system will be slower than a comperably equipped X58 system. And this is coming from a guy still on a 790i rig!

LOL, you're so confused manX68 is the next LGA2011 chipset, not sure what you mean. 36 lanes are available in X58 and in dual SLI they work x16 x16, with 3 cards most will support x16 x8 x8The IGP does not have anything to do with overclock, non K chips overclock less simply because Intel decided to limit their OC capabilities to 400MHz and P67 boardsGulftown is slower in benchmarks and in any real life apps that don't make use of 6 cores efficiently, like FSXAlso, in single GPU configs, P67 will run at x16, just as X58: no differenceIn dual SLI X58 runs x16 x16, vs P67's x8 x8... google the real world difference. It's a 1-2%, so that's a non factor... just like tripple channelAnd for video encoding and stuff like that where Gulftowns shine because of the 2 extra cores, wait until software catches up with AVX and probably a 2600K will beat Gulftowns there too

Dario,How could I send you a file with the data you requested me?, because is too big to upload.Andrew,I have 8GB(4x2) by ignorance. What do you think must I do to a better performance?Nick,My ignorance prevents me follow your reasoning.Thanks everyone in advance,Francisco Mateos