August 1, 201114 yr Commercial Member I find good FSX add-ons run at 1/3 the speed (frame rate) of the stock Cessna. This has been fairly consistent across systems. Best regards,Robin.
August 1, 201114 yr If you can do the 747 at 30fps, then you should be able to do the ngx at that. The 747 you speak of....I presume it is the PMDG 747? Yup. The default 737 i find acceptable for a default airplane, but the 747 is absolutely terrible. Cristi Neagu
August 1, 201114 yr Commercial Member And what exactly are you using Vin? i7920 @3.6 Ghz, GTX 285, 12 GB 1600RAM, Vista Ultimate (64) Vin Scimone Precision Manuals Development Group www.precisionmanuals.com
August 1, 201114 yr i7920 @3.6 Ghz, GTX 285, 12 GB 1600RAM, Vista Ultimate (64) How come you're still stuck with that bad Vista I went to Win 7 the moment I knew it was faster than Vista... Regards, Renzo Marcus
August 1, 201114 yr i7920 @3.6 Ghz, GTX 285, 12 GB 1600RAM, Vista Ultimate (64)Ok thats good news for me since we have the same guts in our PCs but why the heck am I getting extremely bad performance on 1920x1080? Do you know why? It makes me angry why resolution is the only variable that changes things when it seems like everyone and their mom runs on 1920x1080 and gets the same perf. i get on measly 1280x1024. FAA: ATP-ME, 737 CA, enough time in the 757/767 to be dangerous 🤠 Matt Kubanda, 7950X3D, 64GB RAM, RTX 5090@4k, MSFS 2024
August 1, 201114 yr I had the same problem with kinda same setup, but than I found http://www.venetubo.com/fsx.html which is great tuning tool. You should give it a try ;)I applied vsync and have nice 30-40fps on average :) Jakub Jochec - CZE Feel free to ban me, but gime me good reason
August 4, 201114 yr I have a Windows XP Pentium IV 2.8 Ghz and the rest i dont know but I have the PMDG MD-11 and it works okay.....So do you think it will run good??
Create an account or sign in to comment