January 13, 201214 yr I'd rather just take my PC12..In the real world, cost of ownership is a big consideration (in FSX less so..)A PC12 is a LOT more money than a Malibu Jetprop.. like a million dollars more..that is what makes the Malibu attractive. Fast at altitude for relatively small dollars.. Edited January 13, 201214 yr by Bert Pieke Bert
January 13, 201214 yr The PC-12 is a whole different beast!3x the power2x the MTOW15ft longer9 seat PT6A-67BPA46T is slower and smaller but Carenado did a great job on it! Well wort it to me! "To most the sky is the limit but to me it's home" Rick Harms (CYVR) i7 [email protected] (for now) asus p6t v2, 6gb ocz 1600 CL7 ram. BFG 285 oc, vista 64, Samsung 52" 1080p lcd track IR5. PMDG j41, 747-400x, 747-8i/f, NGX.......Finally!!!!
January 13, 201214 yr Agree, Carenado did a great job on this one, a real joy to fly! You really feel you moved up to a high performance aircraft. The VC is outstanding! Love it!!!Thank you Carenado!!!Martin
January 13, 201214 yr Author LOL, I know it's odd.. but I've been choosing which planes to buy based on how I can use them in my virtual charter company... I guess I could still get this, I was looking it up on air charter guide and they rent for $800-900/hr where as the pc12 rents at 1345-1500/hr !So I guess I could use it as a lower cost alternative for my "customers" it does look very cool indeed. Ciao!
Create an account or sign in to comment