All these FSX screens that get posted make me say... wow Flight really does look good! lol

 

You nailed it.... :Just Kidding:

Do not proceed talking about FSX looking better or not here, please, or I will have to lock this topic. We don't want people here only saying Flight isn't any good but we also don't want people here only saying FSX doesn't look good. The subject is the Carbon Cub (PROBABLY) not having a VC. A lot has been said about other things too, but let's try to keep it on topic from here on.

HA! HA!..but try that in a Ultra lite Half Plane,certified to fly with out a 3rd class medical??.....OK guys just making a point. It was a great Flight!..Real time,real weather!..AnyWho in the Clouds?...20000FT?? Vis 3miles? Can not see much ANYWHO!..however ask WHAT IF?? What IF Flight gave us PLANES???

Now Theres A FLIGHT we would all go for!! The Next Generation!..everybody's Dream! WHERE WE CAN BOLDLY GO!GAMES and ALL..in our Grasp!..We Shall See! Meanwhile I get better pictures of Alaska in a National Geographic Magazine!...Then again note my Avator...we thought that looked good also,so good in fact so good, ,it brought us all here,made this site possible for years now,created an industry!! What Flight Needs are the BILL LYONS, and others, of our make believe world!

HAVE FUN!!..I ARE!!

You know, folks, it occurs to me that cockpitless aircraft are the future: Predator, Reaper, et al. Check out http://en.wikipedia...._2007-08-07.jpg. Time to abandon your fond hopes of an instrument panel; embrace the suck :-)!

 

UAVs have cockpits...

 

They just leave them at home.

You sound remarkably like a spambot

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Bold text in red followed by three off topic posts. This is going nowhere. Topic locked.