Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
utd4life10

Touch down rate

Recommended Posts

What sort of touch-down rate should you be aiming for with the NGX on landing. By that I mean -xxx feet ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They dont actually aim for a specific vertical speed in real life. They aim for a firm landing instead.


vatsim s3

1133704.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They dont actually aim for a specific vertical speed in real life. They aim for a firm landing instead.

 

HAHA!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is an unfortunate side-effect of VAs trying to implement metrics to determine pilot quality. Smooth touchdowns aren't the mark of a good pilot. Granted, they do take skill and experience, but they're not the only metric by which a good landing is evaluated. It's very situational. If it's raining, you'd want a firmer touchdown. When you're fighting wind all the way down final, a firm touchdown is sometimes all you can pull off. Furthermore, if it's gusty, attempting to grease it on to the runway leaves you prone to a gust blowing you off centerline in the last moments.

 

The long and short of it is: put it on the runway as softly as possible for passenger comfort, yet firm enough for a safe landing based on conditions, while not so firm as to damage the landing gear.

 

Furthermore:

Look outside! You shouldn't have your head down looking at the gauges that close to the runway. You'll come to understand smooth as you continue flying.


Kyle Rodgers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, this is an unfortunate side-effect of VAs trying to implement metrics to determine pilot quality. Smooth touchdowns aren't the mark of a good pilot. Granted, they do take skill and experience, but they're not the only metric by which a good landing is evaluated. It's very situational. If it's raining, you'd want a firmer touchdown. When you're fighting wind all the way down final, a firm touchdown is sometimes all you can pull off. Furthermore, if it's gusty, attempting to grease it on to the runway leaves you prone to a gust blowing you off centerline in the last moments.

 

The long and short of it is: put it on the runway as softly as possible for passenger comfort, yet firm enough for a safe landing based on conditions, while not so firm as to damage the landing gear.

 

Furthermore:

Look outside! You shouldn't have your head down looking at the gauges that close to the runway. You'll come to understand smooth as you continue flying.

 

Great Summary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Touchdown zone and centreline tracking is what you should be concentrating on. All you're doing by trying to grease a landing is ruining your landing performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Big thing to remember is on speed and on glide path. As long as you fight for center-line, speed, and glide path, the hard part is done. Cross the threshold on altitude, and initiate your flare at the 20ft call out and add about 2 to 3 degrees and you are done. Once you master the text book landings, you will find techniques on power pull and flare timing to achieve better touch downs. As long as you touch between 1200 to 2000 down, you should be fine. Have a read of the training manual, the landing guidance will put you in the right ball park. In my real world landings, I'm more focused on the call outs and aimpoint as i look down the runway to judge my sink rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From an equipment standpoint, anything over - 500fpm runs the risk of seriously damaging the gear.

 

Not to mention many other parts of your plane as well; just take a look at that ANA 767 video from a month or two ago for an example.

 

The FAA requires a 10 fps (so -600 fpm) touchdown at maximum landing weight as a certification limit, but that's an ultimate limit, so even rates below that might require a post-landing maintenance check. For the MD-11 Boeing recommends 2 to 4 fps (so 120 to 240 fpm) as the touchdown rate, I'm guessing the 737 would be similar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not aiming for a specific touchdown rate either. That changes with the conditions.

 

Stabilized approach with a normal descent rate, correct approach speed, aiming for the TDZ. I don't hold it off to make greasers.

 

Looking at ACARS afterwards I see that it normally ends up around 200 ft/min +/- 100.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...