March 17, 201313 yr Flight 1s PA46 is not for fsx. http://www.flight1.com/products.asp?product=carmalibu A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. - Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
March 17, 201313 yr Flight 1 - advanced planes with top notch technical support and a 30 refund - - - Carenado - not very responsive to customers - bug lists that get quite long many of which never get resolved - and unless Bernt fixes the FDE - pretty weak flight models... These are just generalizations on the companies and not commenting on the two planes in question...<br /><br />Regards,<br />Scott And, with respect, like all generalities this gets tripped up a bit by the specifics. For example, in this case Bernt Stolle did the original flight model as he has most recent Carenado releases. This particular knock on Carenado is mostly a thing of the past. I agree with the others, however. I think you've got your heart set on the Pilatus. Get it and give it a shot. Flight1's return policy makes that pretty much the risk free way to go. Best of luck to you in deciding, Scott
March 18, 201313 yr Yeah I already told you my opinion. Dated model. Decent flight modeling (not that I've ever flown a PC12), systems light compared to a big tube liner. But I don't know of any full systems modeled on a small GA plane... Except the Aerosoft Katana 4X. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
Create an account or sign in to comment