September 17, 201312 yr I was wondering if anyone has tried this scenery. I am thinking about getting Califonia, but I don't know if to go with this one or with Megascenery 2.0. Is Blue Sky High Deffinition? Does it has Autogen? How does it compares with Megascenery 2.0?
September 17, 201312 yr Does not have autogen, but the high def ones (you have to look, they have both) for FSX are rather nice. You can always add your own autogen if you have the FSX SDK installed with the annotator. Since Bluesky is free, d/l an area, if you don't like it get the megascenery one. Best, Michael KDFW
September 18, 201312 yr Actually it does have some autogen, it depends on the area, but no where near default FSX. However it looks so good you probably wont notice its missing Jay
September 18, 201312 yr blue sky on top of MSE v2 is what you do in certain areas i found works well.
September 18, 201312 yr I like Blue Sky Scenery in the areas where I have it, which is the west coast between LA and San Francisco, some parts of which come with autogen, and in Nevada, where the lack of autogen is not really recognizable - and the desert around Las Vegas looks stunning with it. I would really recommend you to try this absolutely stunning freeware first, because not everyone is into photoscenery, so you can see if you like this kind of scenery, and then you can still move on to payware if you wish to. Florian
September 18, 201312 yr I like it and use it extensively around California where I know the landscape from RW flying. The only shortcoming for me is the Sierras where it is predominently wooded. I leave it at FSX default. The deserts and Central Valley and coastline are all BlueSky for me. If Orbx ever releases a California done like Pacific PNW then I'd probably switch but otherwise BlueSky is a fantastic resource.
September 18, 201312 yr This is an automatic message. This topic has been moved from "MS FSX Forum" to "The Photoreal Scenery Support Forum". This move has been done for a number of possible reasons. The most likely reason is that the post was off topic. The topic could also have contained images or a video that were not appropriate to the original forum it was posted in. The images might not have been "illustrative" or "explanatory" in nature. The topic could have been moved because we deemed it to be more appropriately placed elsewhere. Please ensure that your posts are "on topic" and contain illustrative images or videos as appropriate. Do not post videos or images just for entertainment purposes anywhere but in the screen shot or video forums. See our image posting rules here. Members who continue to post off topic posts can be denied entry to specific forums in order to reduce and remove the practice. Your cooperation is appreciated. ADMIN BOT... Do not PM or send Email.
October 3, 201312 yr I have Sim Savvy, which has issues with water masking (it doesn't have it). Can I overlay BSS coast portions to eliminate that problem? Wondering if anyone tried that to fix the water issue in SS. Thanks!
Create an account or sign in to comment