November 11, 201312 yr I have the Posky 777-200 and have noticed that I have to have a minimum speed of approx. 220 before the aircraft takes off by which time I am crashing into the airport surroundings like buildings. Usually the take off speed for other models is approx. 180. Is there some way I can resolve this issue, for example by changing something in the aircraft file. Other Posky models which I have seem to be oke. Any suggestions welcome.
November 11, 201312 yr Which flap and trim settings do you have? Sent from my Nokia 1100 Best regards,Luis Hernández Main rig: self built, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D (with SMT off and CO -50 mV), 2x16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, Nvidia RTX 5060Ti 16GB, 256 GB M.2 SSD (OS+apps) + 2x1 TB SATA III SSD (sims) + 1 TB 7200 rpm HDD (storage), ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS air cooler, Viewsonic VX2458-MHD 1920x1080@120-144 Hz (G-sync compatible), Windows 11. Running P3D v5.4 (with v4.5 scenery objects as an additional library, just in case), FSX-SE, MSFS2020, MSFS2024 and even FS9! Lossless Scaling for all my sims. What a godsend...Mobile rig: ASUS Zenbook UM425QA (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H APU @3.2 GHz and boost disabled, 1 TB M.2 SSD, 16 GB RAM, Windows 11 Pro). Running FS9 there .VKB Gladiator NXT Premium Left + GNX THQ as primary controllers. Xbox Series X|S wireless controller as standby/mobile.
November 11, 201312 yr Commercial Member And what is the take off weight of the aircraft? Even 180 knots is too high at max take off weight Rob Prest
November 11, 201312 yr Author Thanks for your replies I am not an expert pilot so I do not set anything. I just use my joystick to start and take off. I do this with all my aircraft without getting the issue with Posky.
November 11, 201312 yr Commercial Member Hi again Although the posky 777 is a simple representation it is likely whoever designed the flight dynamics put some effort into simulating the behaviour of the real aircraft. It is important to understand some basics like weight and balance. Simply loading the aircraft up with a random amount of fuel and cargo will likely lead to frustration. At the very least reduce the weight and fuel load and give it another try. Regards Rob Prest
November 12, 201312 yr Author Found the solution as mentioned above in the Weight & Balance section in the Aircraft file. There were cargo & passenger weights, disabled them using //. I am now getting a take-off speed op approx. 175, and before the end of the runway is reached. Once again thanks for your advice.
November 12, 201312 yr Thanks for your replies I am not an expert pilot so I do not set anything. I just use my joystick to start and take off. I do this with all my aircraft without getting the issue with Posky. Because with large commercial jets, you do not just jump in and take off. You need to set the flaps, as they're there to increase wing area and lift. On the 777, you can take off with flaps 5 or flaps 15. If you're not using flaps for take-off, that would explain why you're taking off at 200 knots since the wing isn't able to generate enough lift. Captain Kevin Air Kevin 124 heavy, wind calm, runway 4 left, cleared for take-off. Live streams of my flights here.
November 12, 201312 yr I am now getting a take-off speed op approx. 175, and before the end of the runway is reached. Even 175 knots is too high unless the plane is very heavily loaded, and commenting out the cargo and pax weights is not the way to go. You should put those back. You need to check how much fuel you have. Typically, FS loads a plane with full tanks, which means that, in the case of a 777, it will be well over maximum takeoff weight. You reduced the load by eliminating pax and cargo, but you need to focus instead on fuel. If you figure about 15-16000 lbs of fuel per hour of flight, plus another 10,000 for climb to cruise altitude and an extra hour's fuel for contingencies, that should give you a reasonable fuel load. Fill the wing tanks first, then the center. Rarely will all three tanks be full. In a real world United video, a 777-200 going from Chicago to London had @ 135,000 lbs of fuel -- way less than maximum capacity. Opensky 777s are not very far off from real in fuel consumption. In the FS Aircraft fuel and payload tab (where you can change the fuel amount), make sure the total weight isn't red, which would mean the aircraft is over maximum takeoff weight. As Kevin said, you need to use at least 5o of flaps. You also need to pay attention to trim. On an Opensky 777, about 5 trim up for lightly loaded, about 7 for heavily loaded. If you have a proper fuel load and are well under the maximum gross weight, it should rotate well below 175. Mike
November 13, 201312 yr Hi, Christiaan, I just loaded an Opensky 777-200, 16038 lbs over max takeoff weight due to full fuel, and a 777-200ER, 21667 lbs overweight for same reason. I also found tables for V speeds. For a fully loaded (572,000 lbs total weight) 777-200 with PW 77000 lb thrust engines, V2 (takeoff speed) is 163 for flaps 5. For a fully loaded (660,000 lbs) 777-200ER with PW 90,000 lbs thrust, V2 is 175 for flaps 5. I have used a V Speed gauge with data derived from these tables and they take off when they should. There is a V Speed gauge by Rob Barendregt. It shows V speeds for various flap settings and lights up red if the plane is overweight. If you know how to install gauges and download it, I can send you files customized for the various versions of the 777. I've used them with Opensky panels, mostly merged with PSS panels. Mike
November 13, 201312 yr Yeah, because the simulator by default loads maximum fuel, which if you're also carrying maximum payload, is going to make you overweight. It's a balance between payload and fuel, but you can't have maximum payload and maximum fuel at the same time. Captain Kevin Air Kevin 124 heavy, wind calm, runway 4 left, cleared for take-off. Live streams of my flights here.
November 13, 201312 yr Moderator 1. buy fsx 2. buy pmdg 777 You forgot to add number 3. Spend at least 1500UKP (2200USD) on a new PC capable of running 1 and 2. :rolleyes: Some people are happy with FS9 believe it or not. Ray (Cheshire, England). System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant. Cheadle Hulme Weather website.
November 13, 201312 yr Commercial Member Ray, how are you finding that 780? I have picked up a 780Ti but won't be able to test it for a month. My last card was the 670FTW. Rob Prest
November 13, 201312 yr Moderator Ray, how are you finding that 780? I have picked up a 780Ti but won't be able to test it for a month. My last card was the 670FTW. Hi Rob, Really pleased with it. My previous card (for FS9) was a 8800GTX but of course I've since migrated to FSX. You won't be disappointed with the Ti which is even more powerful. Ray (Cheshire, England). System: P3D v5.3HF2, Intel i9-13900K, MSI 4090 GAMING X TRIO 24G, Crucial T700 4Tb M.2 SSD, Asus ROG Maximus Z790 Hero, 32Gb Corsair Vengeance DDR5 6000Mhz RAM, Win 11 Pro 64-bit, BenQ PD3200U 32” UHD monitor, Fulcrum One yoke, Fulcrum Throttle Quadrant. Cheadle Hulme Weather website.
November 13, 201312 yr Commercial Member Hi Rob, Really pleased with it. My previous card (for FS9) was a 8800GTX but of course I've since migrated to FSX. You won't be disappointed with the Ti which is even more powerful. Good to hear! Am looking forward to giving it a test run. Cheers Rob Prest
Create an account or sign in to comment