Luis Hernandez

What a wall of text. I'm sure you got some help redacting this. On the other hand, while I'm almost 100% MSFS2024, I'm envious of your satisfaction with P3Dv4 😁 However, one of your key considerations (no aircraft traffic at all) is a deal-breaker for me. I can forego all road and water traffic, but I can't stand going to a major hub devoid of aircraft, but I'm not you. I still have a couple of questions: Do you use GSX? For me, their implementation of jetways in P3Dv4 was peak. Not even the MSFS2024 version tops it. Do you lock your framerate? If so, how (in-sim, NCP, RTSS) and which value? Also, which Windows do you use (10 or 11) and version (24H2, 25H2, 26H2) do you use? Anything after 24H2 has caused issues with addons in P3D v5.4. Somehow, v5.3 and earlier are not affected.

They were quick, just 3 days after IFreemz released his fix.

Imagetool, available in the SDK.

Looks interesting. If not for Chaseplane; I'd have given it a try.

If you're GPU-limited

As always, IslandSimPilot lagging behind 😂

That's a memo iFly missed back in 2014 😂 If only they were interested in releasing one for MSFS...

I also have 32 GB. I didn't see it maxed out. The only issue I saw was switching views with Chaseplane. The developer is aware of this, and now we (both developer and I) want to try with the default cameras. I need to come up with a method to do so without complicating my control setup.

I gave it a try. The only side effect that I found is that, when I switch from a view without displays (example: overhead or spot view) to a view with displays (as captain's view), I'm getting some distracting pauses that can be felt. That in Chaseplane. I'm not sure if this happens when using default camera system. Yes. That's how this fix is injected into the sim

I'm not sure, I neither used it. I'll be giving it a try. Because, as an antialiasing method, TAA leaves too much to be desired, comparing to what we used to have in previous sims (the good old 8xSQ AA available for FSX, for example). In 1080p I was forced to use Rendering Scaling values above 100 for reducing shimmering. Also, distant textures end up too blurry. DLSS improves on this, but the price to pay was the smearing/ghosting in glass instruments. That is TAA's strength in MSFS. That Reshade-based utility looks like a way to have at last your cake and eat it too.

Some guy made this addon to Reshade, that fixes our biggest complain with DLSS: Requirements: Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024, DirectX 12. Tested on the Microsoft Store / Xbox app (Game Pass) version. The Steam version runs the same game and should work the same way: reports welcome. NVIDIA RTX GPU with DLSS Super Resolution selected in the sim's graphics settings. ReShade 6.7 or newer with full add-on support (the "with full add-on support" download) Download link: https://github.com/IFreemz/msfs2024-glass-cockpit-dlss-fix This man deserves, at minimum, a beer 🙇🏻‍♂️

Ciao Andrea, I understand your feeling. I also miss them. Somehow I felt more comfortable discussing FS9 stuff there than here

@jcomm , I remember you using FSHud some time ago. For the same traffic levels, do you find FSHud or BATC lighter on the CPU?

At last! Hopefully they finished fixing the cruise oscillations. Yesterday I tried the latest pre-release version. Oscillations were less, but there were.

Do you remember how high did you use to have it?

Mmm, now I understand why I was still getting these unwanted cruise oscillations. I'll try again tonight. Thank you!

I love it. It's the best A340 I've ever flown. I only wish the A330-200 was as detailed as the A340.

Ouch, horrible. Thank God there were no casualties 🙏 This may appear as unsensitive, but I couldn't stop thinking about it: the first report of this was the thread at Airliners.net, where it simply said "Worrying flight data on Flydubai flight 1073 (squawk 7500 and 7700 rapid dive)". I can't imagine switching between 7500 and 7700 in an Airbus or an Embraer, where you type digit by digit, without a standby.

Oh, understood. I thought it was like the FSL buses or any MSFS aircraft, where you simply pressed a button and the EFB and MCDU imported the flight plan directly, without any downloaders. I don't remember downloading any flightplans from Simbrief in the Q400 format.

Well, your monitor is still very good. As Somiller said:

But they hid all sensitive drawings from her. I mean, you may be able to obtain the part geometry, but I'm sure you can't get the definite material and tolerances just by looking. And that makes the difference between a supersonic fighter and a rapid unscheduled disassembly (a.k.a. big bada-boom!) 11:30: That's a heavily customized version of P3D v6, right?

Does your current 4K monitor have G-sync or any kind of VRR?

Didn't know the Q400 had Simbrief connection. Unless you're talking about the $20 visual extension pack.

I like your idea. However, the ini buses I have that rely on the default AIRAC (i.e., all but the 340 and 350) require the airports to be up to date. If not, all procedures disappear. An example of that is the freeware SPJC scenery available at the .to (can't link it, page is blocked at my job). It only has one active runway, when the current SPJC has 2 (and a terminal between them). As soon as I removed this scenery and used the default 2024 one, I got my procedures back. Have you tried the Navdata-only subscription? It's around €29/year. That's what I use.

Loading times