May 12, 20197 yr Hello, I have recently build a new computer. 9900K 32GB ram 2 SSD 1TB/512GB GTX 780. I have noticed that the GPU sits on 100% all the time and the CPU is around 12%. And it is devided over 2 cores (0-2). So I wonder if the GTX 780 is the bottleneck here? The values stay there, even if I set everything on low. FPS is between 25-50. Set to 60. Where I am not unsatisfied about this. Thanks ahead, RobB
May 13, 20197 yr What are you doing to drive the GPU to 100%? Are you maxing out VRAM usage? Start by reducing settings to get the GPU usage down! Bert
May 13, 20197 yr Yeah that's an old card. You're pretty unbalanced at the moment. Try to find a GTX 1070 Ti or a straight 1080 and you'll notice a big difference. | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
May 13, 20197 yr Commercial Member 5 hours ago, emisary said: I have noticed that the GPU sits on 100% all the time and the CPU is around 12%. So I wonder if the GTX 780 is the bottleneck here? Absolutely. Luke Kolin I make simFDR, the most advanced flight data recorder for FSX, Prepar3D and X-Plane.
May 13, 20197 yr Author @Bert Pieke Absolutely nothing. All settings minimal (sliders to the left). No AA or traffic. And weather I did put the sliders of the world to the right not even the fps changed. CPU usage and FPS stayed the same. FPS only dropped after I added 10% traffic. Tessalation was set to 0. @ryanbatcund @Luke Thanks for the advice. Fastest in the shops around here is the 1050, or jump the 1660 or even the 208/2070. Thanks, RobB
May 13, 20197 yr 1 hour ago, emisary said: @Bert Pieke Absolutely nothing. All settings minimal (sliders to the left). No AA or traffic. And weather I did put the sliders of the world to the right not even the fps changed. CPU usage and FPS stayed the same. FPS only dropped after I added 10% traffic. Tessalation was set to 0. @ryanbatcund @Luke Thanks for the advice. Fastest in the shops around here is the 1050, or jump the 1660 or even the 208/2070. Thanks, RobB 9900k 2070 would be a nice combo http://
May 13, 20197 yr Author Would the gtx 2080 or 2080 TI add something? I am considering either of the 2. I even saw some tests with SLI. I am using 3x 24" monitors. And I am not sure if I like that. Thanks RobB
May 13, 20197 yr the perfect combo with 9900k is single 2080TI, one more card dont give mutch If you run P3D with high settings a single 2080TI handle +5.5ghz cpu , i have some 2080TI tested SLI think i not have cpu for it i stuck with single card. when i run 2x1080TI SLI there its a benefit over single card , but not much with the 2080TI Edited May 13, 20197 yr by westman http://
May 13, 20197 yr Rob, Try this site...I use it for trying different combinations of hardware before I "dream" of my new system.....http://thebottlenecker.com/#home Interesting results often times. Regards.....Chris Hoping For CAVU --- Chris
May 13, 20197 yr 4 hours ago, emisary said: Then I will buy the 2080TI. Thank you for the Advice. RobB You're going to notice a big difference (of course it will cost a bit ha) | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
May 13, 20197 yr Author after 15 minutes of flight I am getting Card 780 stopped working. Is that what you meant by:"to few memory"? Thanks, RobB
May 13, 20197 yr 21 minutes ago, emisary said: after 15 minutes of flight I am getting Card 780 stopped working. Is that what you meant by:"to few memory"? Thanks, RobB Run GPU-Z (freeware) alongside your flightsim.. it allows you to track both VRAM and GPU usage numbers.. and temperature... (Sensors tab..) Edited May 13, 20197 yr by Bert Pieke Bert
May 14, 20197 yr Author Considering all the stories here, how much would I gain with the TI over the non-ti 2080? I ask that because the pricetag is nearly 50% difference. If it is 30 to 33 fps or 50 to 55 fps I might even consider the non ti. But later regret it ;-). There is a chance not taking the 3x 24, but going back to 1x 24" due to the stretched images on the 2 outer monitors. Which looks ugly, but I could get used to. Thanks for your thoughts.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.