July 8, 20196 yr Commercial Member 2 hours ago, pracines said: Why would your "counter"-point allow for a custom this or that which must be met, when I specifically said default (NO ADDONS)? Does this make you or me correct? ... be honest. You stated it wouldn't be as successful. Your assumption is that the home user is the "success". Prepar3D is successful because it fills a specific target market (one which even the new sim will not touch). Training. The training market still has both demands and expectations and L-M thus far has given a great deal of attention to them. Not sure why you think the training market is going to stop using Prepar3D. Irony of ironies, I would say that the vast majority of changes to Prepar3D were brought about by L-M's own needs, after all... they're their first and foremost customer. As for "serious flight simmers"... I do not view them the same as flight schools. Sorry. Ed Wilson Mindstar AviationMy Playland - I69
July 8, 20196 yr In keeping with thread the key thing Microsoft need to do is give more information next month august as stated. Raymond Fry.
July 8, 20196 yr 1 hour ago, WarpD said: You stated it wouldn't be as successful. Your assumption is that the home user is the "success". Prepar3D is successful because it fills a specific target market (one which even the new sim will not touch). Training. The training market still has both demands and expectations and L-M thus far has given a great deal of attention to them. Not sure why you think the training market is going to stop using Prepar3D. Irony of ironies, I would say that the vast majority of changes to Prepar3D were brought about by L-M's own needs, after all... they're their first and foremost customer. As for "serious flight simmers"... I do not view them the same as flight schools. Sorry. Time will tell.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.