Jump to content

Sign in to follow this  
Arklight1

Orbx - TrueEarth NorCal - VERY soon!

Recommended Posts

Do you think there’s much visible difference between the SD & HD versions?  

  • Like 1

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, jon b said:

Do you think there’s much visible difference between the SD & HD versions?  

Not sure, but there's screenshots of both in the previews section 🙂


Ark

--------------------------

I9 9900K @ 5ghz / 32GB G.Skill (Samsung B) / Aorus Master Mobo / EVGA GTX 2080Ti FTW 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just been browsing them thanks. I’ve got the space I think  so HD , Cheers 

Edited by jon b

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jon b said:

just been browsing them thanks. I’ve got the space I think  so HD , Cheers 

 

I have read a quote of John Venema right now which might be of interest for some of you:

 
Quote

Posted 13 hours ago

On 11/11/2019 at 8:47 PM, Badl4ndz said:

John, which version is recommended for use with VR? SD or HD? I'm currently using TE GB with my Oculus Rift S and i'm pleased with the performance.

John Venema:

Depends on if you fly low and slow or not.

I'd go with HD if you like skimming valleys and towns or go with SD for faster loading, less GPU usage and flying > 2500ft.

I have SD installed myself and did a lovely VR flight in my Oculus Rift S yesterday from KHAF Half Moon Bay to KSQL San Carlos and I did not really notice the difference in texture quality once I was into my climb over the hills.

Keep in mind that buying HD gives you both options because you get access to SD at no cost.

Found on ORBX Forum  here  .

And here you can find  TE US NorCal HD XP11 My Final Shots  from Iain Emms.

Edited by KBUR
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd like to think that, as good as Washington is, the same team would generate Oregon then NorCal - don't think so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, olderndirt said:

You'd like to think that, as good as Washington is, the same team would generate Oregon then NorCal - don't think so.

Oregon was/is very disappointing...in hindsight I could have passed on it...but...I do think, that with the published disappointment on the ORBX forums from some purchasers of that T.E.....I think that that 'blow back'  did effect/nurture/enhance----- the quality and content of their soon-to-release; North Cal....yes, I think so...and future releases in the series, to boot!

Edited by Sesquashtoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, KBUR said:

 

I have read a quote of John Venema right now which might be of interest for some of you:

Thanks for that KBUR, yes that last sentence makes the purchase choice easy, if you get both packages with the purchase of the HD version then that’s got to be the way to go , for me at least. The notes on VR are interesting, I’m thinking low and slow pleasure flights over the Bay Area are going to be my main use for this TE.

I have the entire GB TE set and  often use that for low level  VR flights through the Scottish and Welsh mountains in the JF hawk at 420kts, my rig seems to cope ok with that.

  • Like 1

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually found Oregon quite good after they copped the criticism on the chin about the ortho and released a service pack that substantially improved the coloring. For the 3D models and overlay alone Oregon is worth it, plus it will give me a seamless contigious scenery area from BC down to Mexico once Socal is released.

I never imagined the entire west coast would be available with this level of detail and modeling in X-Plane, it's marvellous!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I note the SD version will be 2M per pixel and the HD version 1M per pixel.  Just for comparison with my existing TE products can anyone tell me the resolution of the TE GB series?I can’t seem to find it in the products description notes, thanks.

 

  • Upvote 1

787 captain.  

Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
  • Donation Goals

    AVSIM's 2020 Fundraising Goal

    Donate to our annual general fundraising goal. This donation keeps our doors open and providing you service 24 x 7 x 365. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. We reset this goal every new year for the following year's goal.


    45%
    $11,410.00 of $25,000.00 Donate Now
×
×
  • Create New...