February 6, 20206 yr 1 hour ago, mSparks said: Aircraft also don't use reverse thrust to stop, they only use it to reduce the load on the brakes, to help stop them overheating I guess what you meant was, that it is not their primary goal to decelerate. Edited February 6, 20206 yr by tweekz Happy with MSFS 🙂 home simming evolved
February 6, 20206 yr 1 hour ago, mSparks said: There was a fault in I forget which plane where the reverse thrust engaged on one side during flight and caused the plane to crash That was the Lauda Air 767 crash. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
February 6, 20206 yr 13 minutes ago, tweekz said: ...they kinda contribute to stopping the aircraft Exactly. On a dry runway stopping distance is always calculated without reverse thrust. It would be a serious design flaw if the brakes would overheat during a landing without reverse thrust. Edited February 6, 20206 yr by FDEdev
February 6, 20206 yr Just now, FDEdev said: No, it doesn't make sense and it's of course wrong. On a dry runway stopping distance is always calculated without reverse thrust. It would be a basic design flaw if the brakes would overheat during a landing without applying reverse thrust. I edited my post, as I guess he meant the purpose for the usage of the thrusters. Language can be ambiguous at times. 🙂 Happy with MSFS 🙂 home simming evolved
February 6, 20206 yr 10 minutes ago, tweekz said: I guess what you meant was, that it is not their primary goal to decelerate. 8 minutes ago, tweekz said: That makes no sense. If they support the brakes in braking so they won't overheat... they kinda contribute to stopping the aircraft, don't you agree? When reverse thrust is engaged, the autobrakes reduce the braking, leaving stopping distance the same. Mentour Pilot did a nice guide a couple of weeks ago. AutoATC Developer
February 6, 20206 yr 1 minute ago, tweekz said: ... the usage of the thrusters. Again, jet engines have thrust reversers. Reverse thrusters or thrusters are usually rocket engines and can only be found on spacecraft.
February 6, 20206 yr Just now, FDEdev said: Again, jet engines have thrust reversers. Reverse thrusters or thrusters are usually rocket engines and can only be found on spacecraft. I am sorry. I'm not a native speaker. I am flawed in that regard. 😄 Happy with MSFS 🙂 home simming evolved
February 6, 20206 yr 23 minutes ago, tweekz said: I am sorry. I'm not a native speaker. I am flawed in that regard. 😄 No need to be sorry (and I'm no native speaker either). This happens to native speakers non-pilots as well. Just checked the funny 744 'test' and apart from the unrealistic banking during the deceleration (my Land Rover Defender was behaving that way!), the way the brakes are heating up is unrealistic as well. Edited February 6, 20206 yr by FDEdev
February 6, 20206 yr 8 minutes ago, FDEdev said: the way the brakes are heating up is very unrealistic. Which part of the manual are you referring to? it was matched to Boeings spec based on weight and speed for maximum breaking. If you think you can do better, its free and open source. More help always welcome. Surely beats sitting round waiting for a computer game. Edited February 6, 20206 yr by mSparks AutoATC Developer
February 6, 20206 yr 12 minutes ago, mSparks said: When reverse thrust is engaged, the autobrakes reduce the braking, leaving stopping distance the same. Mentour Pilot did a nice guide a couple of weeks ago. I got what you meant. That's why I edited it. Happy with MSFS 🙂 home simming evolved
February 6, 20206 yr 43 minutes ago, mSparks said: Which part of the manual are you referring to? it was matched to Boeings spec based on weight and speed for maximum breaking. If you think you can do better, its free and open source. More help always welcome. Surely beats sitting round waiting for a computer game. For just a moment there I thought someone had hacked your account. But credit where credit is due - a decent reply to a post that some could easily have taken personally.
February 8, 20206 yr Author Well... So much for a Dumb question, (asked at beguiling) This post is based on observation and talking to pilots while waiting for my next flight on layovers.. I tested it on Xplane and seem info given was right.. I'm taking a break from trips but will see what future brings.. 10 plus year of non stop traveling on a weekly bases. I could tell you some stories! Wish you all get the sim you hope for and the hardware to match. My self getting my eye in the hardware (including New Computer Sys, and new Throttles) All else working good. Best regards
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.