Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Langyboy63

16MB RAM, is it enough?

Recommended Posts

32 gig would be my choice but only with 2 sticks.  I would give 16 gig to Windows alone.  The cost of a 16 gig stick is a pittance these days.

Cheers

bs

  • Like 1

AMD RYZEN 9 5900X 12 CORE CPU - ZOTAC RTX 3060Ti GPU - NZXT H510i ELITE CASE - EVO M.2 970 500GB DRIVE - 32GB XTREEM 4000 MEM - XPG GOLD 80+ 650 WATT PS - NZXT 280 HYBRID COOLER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you ever do need more than 16GB of ram it will be a situation like holding short at O'Hare in a thunderstorm with AI maxed out in a 747 on a 4K screen with ultra settings whilst streaming at the same time ...  not tootling around the corn belt in a 172 on a cloud free day admiring the scenery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first PC in 1996 had 16 MB of SDRAM, ah the good ole days...


MSFS. Hardware: AMD 5600X @4.0Ghz, Corsair H100i RGB Pro XT AIO, MSI MPG B550i Gaming Edge WiFi mobo, RTX 3080ti 12GB FE GPU , G.Skill TridentZ Royal 32GB (2x16) DDR4-3600 RAM CL16, PNY XLR8 3030 1 TB SSD (OS + SIM), Crucial P5 1TB M.2 pcie-3 NVMe SSD (data) . Corsair SF750 80+ Platinum PSU, NZXT H200i Mini ITX Tower.  38" LG UltraGear  38GN950-B display. 4x QL120 fans

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thing seems to scale well with what you have, which is what matters. I see only around 8 to 9GB of my 16GB used, and 3GB of my 6GB of VRAM. Even taking settings to ultra come nowhere near saturating it, in fact, it makes little difference to how much is consumed. Maybe if I flew over vast cities, which I don't as a bush flyer, I would see greater consumption, but I clearly need no more than 16gb at the moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/22/2020 at 2:22 PM, canadiantree said:

My first PC in 1996 had 16 MB of SDRAM, ah the good ole days...

😳  that was a BEAST!! 
I got a 486DX4 with 8 gig.. had to save-up for months to afford that, but after that MSFS  ran at a glórious 15fps  @ 1024x768 with everything on ‘high’  including that balloon at O’hare...  I miss my balloon... 😢   😛

Somehow I never got beyond that mindset that in a sim, èverything above 15 to 20 was fantàstic. I’m still stoked when I see 35 to 45 fps in my overlay, and have to chuckle for a bit when I hear ‘serious gamers’ complain that they cannot get more than 60fps @ 1080p 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/21/2020 at 3:18 PM, curbz said:

Bought another 16GB for a total of 32GB - installed, made no difference, uninstalled and sent back for a refund.

meaningless without other specs and performance bottleneck analysis/metric


SAR Pilot. Flight Sim'ing since the beginning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Flyfaster said:

32GB Minimum and would postulate the faster the RAM the better...

I would add that you should not OC your ram to avoid the hassles.  Just buy good quality parts.

Cheers

bs


AMD RYZEN 9 5900X 12 CORE CPU - ZOTAC RTX 3060Ti GPU - NZXT H510i ELITE CASE - EVO M.2 970 500GB DRIVE - 32GB XTREEM 4000 MEM - XPG GOLD 80+ 650 WATT PS - NZXT 280 HYBRID COOLER

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have almost the same specs as the OP - Ryzen 5 w/1660 SUPER

I upgraded from 16GB to 32GB (hey, RAM was cheap!)

I noticed slight improvement in performance.  My RAM usage usually hovered around 15.5 GB and sometimes over 16GB.  I feel it gives my system a little more headroom and future proofs it a bit. 

I did add the extra RAM before the last patch - so my comparisons are not precise but I get good FPS/performance @high (some ultra/medium) in bush planes and other GA aircraft.  

So slight improvement in my book.  I'll be updating my GPU next year or so... My 1660 Super is running fine with a slight pre-defined manufacturer overclock. Hoping direct x 12 will help it some when it is implemented.

Edited by windseer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the release version I did notices a difference between 16 and 32 because I had a module go bad right after release. Load times where better with 32 vs 16 also I frequently noticed usage above 16 GB.

But after the patches running just the sim. Usage was a bit better. However now that I've got Pilot2ATC, NaviGraph, and some other small utilities running with SimConnect working. I almost always use 16+ GB of ram.

If you are just planning on using the base sim and are looking to do it as cheap as possible don't bother. If your going to run 3rd party add-ons and 16 more GB of ram is not going to break the bank I say go for it.

I'm willing to bet that "study level" add-on aircraft will benefit from the extra ram.

  • Like 1

MSFS, NaviGraph Charts & FMS, Pilot2ATC, FsHub
R5 3600X ,RTX 2060S, 32GB, SSD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...