I did small comparison (although I don't like such thing), I kept looking at this comparison and I was amazed how far the sim has evolved in general with technology, pretty sure bright future ahead! thank you Microsoft and Asobo for this! 

 

I've had so many good flights.  And some bad ones but mostly good.

Is the 2nd one p3d v5?

4 minutes ago, Baber20 said:

Is the 2nd one p3d v5?

Judging by the program focused on the taskbar, yes. Bad comparison, though, as P3D settings are very low or there is a problem with graphics.

Edited October 9, 20205 yr by Evros

18 minutes ago, Evros said:

Judging by the program focused on the taskbar, yes. Bad comparison, though, as P3D settings are very low or there is a problem with graphics.

The graphic settings that I am using the best I can get without having P3D crossing my vram budget (RTX2080), maybe with the new RTX3090 could be better due to the vram capacity.

addones, I have installed all the orbx stuff (world, vector, Germany south and North )

1 hour ago, omarsmak30 said:

best I can get without having P3D crossing my vram budget (RTX2080)

Sadly true. I use v4.5 sometimes, but cannot get v5 because I don't have a good enough video card. I am grateful that I can use my GTX970 on MSFS and have it perform way better than expected. 

I'm using P3D 4.5 on rare occasion now, mainly to stay familiar w/ PMDG NGXu/777 and Majesti Q400.  It's really only good for the better airware now--the rest is completely uninspiring for me these days, and performance ultimately-sucks.  I run HT enabled and temps in P3D are around 67C, in MSFS around 50C.   And those spikes of CPU demand in P3D--and my system is decent for sure.  

Even this simple rural Colorado ag area airport and the TBM is a thing of beauty to behold.  I'm stunned how many simple smaller airports are really quite lovely.  TOTAL game changer.