From what I can see there are two products at about the same price

1) Active Sky P3D
2) FS Global Real Weather

I have Active Sky Next for FSX and as I can see I am not able to get Active Sky P3D at a discounted price. So I think I should consider both options. After reading the product descriptions for the two products I find it hard to decide which is best. Or maybe I should ask what are the strong and weak points of the two products ?

I prefer ASP3D.

I used FSGRW which is really good for P3D v5 (and XP, too). But ASP3D is visually and physically  great together with ASCA (without P3D's EA), no VRAM problem. You wouldn't regret it. 

49 minutes ago, Pegaso said:

I used FSGRW which is really good for P3D v5 (and XP, too). But ASP3D is visually and physically  great together with ASCA (without P3D's EA), no VRAM problem. You wouldn't regret it. 

For XP11 I already have purchased Active Sky. What do you mean with ASP3D together with ASCA ? With ASP3D you don't need another version right ?

Active Sky P3D, what else? It just keeps on delivering and I'm a rex fan. 

I like ActiveSky P3D the most:

- Best Features

- Best representation of real life weather

- Best supported when new P3D versions hit the street (Hotfixes)