July 3, 20214 yr I agree that the interior detail in the JF Turbo Arrow is an immersion killer, very cartoony and 2-dimensional with an air-brushed feel to it. Performance is fine, but unlike everyone in the world, I prefer to fly the Carenado Arrow, despite the generic panel.
July 3, 20214 yr 15 minutes ago, Naki18 said: Really? Not to me it isn't.. Maybe my eyes are shot i say its very fine too, but some people go for the looks others more for how it really flies. the simfliers go for the jf , the lookers for carenado, so all happy, i dont see any issue there.
July 3, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, James Callan said: I agree that the interior detail in the JF Turbo Arrow is an immersion killer, very cartoony and 2-dimensional with an air-brushed feel to it. Performance is fine, but unlike everyone in the world, I prefer to fly the Carenado Arrow, despite the generic panel. Hmm, that is very strange. I mean everyone to their own, and I'm the first to shout about poor VC textures, but for me, I think the JF Arrow VC looks great. Edited July 3, 20214 yr by Rockliffe HowardMSI Mag B650 Tomahawk MB, Ryzen7-7800X3D CPU@5ghz, Arctic AIO II 360 cooler, Nvidia RTX4090 GPU, 32gb DDR5@6000Mhz, SSD/2Tb+SSD/500Gb+OS, Corsair 1000W PSU, LG Ultragear 48"4K, MFG Crosswinds, TQ6 Throttle, Fulcrum One YokeMy FlightSim YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@skyhigh776
July 3, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, James Callan said: I agree that the interior detail in the JF Turbo Arrow is an immersion killer, very cartoony and 2-dimensional with an air-brushed feel to it. Performance is fine, but unlike everyone in the world, I prefer to fly the Carenado Arrow, despite the generic panel. I have seen a few comments like this and do find it surprising as for me the "cartoony" look is the crisp Carenado look. The Carenado aircraft for me have that super clean ultra detailed crisp toy like "made out of plastic" look. They feel like someone has taken to the cockpit with a sharpening filter. Then again I also find those super-saturated far too sharp hi res landscape photos you get all over the internet of impossible sun sets and forest scenes (that everyone else seems to love) very artificial as well. Maybe it is related to what people are used to seeing, or even the different hardware different people are using ( I only have a 1440p screen that is not running HDR with MSFS for example). I suppose in the end everyone is different and people need to make their own decisions about what they like. It is actually the main reason if I do videos, to demonstrate something, I never add any commentary, people need to make their own choices. Edited July 3, 20214 yr by Glenn Fitzpatrick
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.