August 24, 20214 yr On 8/22/2021 at 4:23 AM, martin-w said: I think something like that may be incorporated in the future. I mean we have been warned about the possibility since Asimov and before. All it takes is one rogue operator to not incorporate the safeguards. Elon does amuse me though, he warns of Dire consequences of AI and robots... then develops AI and robots. 🤣 The Singularity Institute, and AI researchers worldwide have been working quietly for quite a few years regarding the subject of trying to keep AI's friendly to humanity.... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_general_intelligence We are all connected..... To each other, biologically...... To the Earth, chemically...... To the rest of the Universe atomically. Devons rig Intel Core i5 13600K @ 5.1GHz / G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Series Ram 64GB / GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GAMING OC 12G Graphics Card / Sound Blaster Z / Meta Quest 2 VR Headset / Klipsch® Promedia 2.1 Computer Speakers / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q ‑ 27" IPS LED Monitor ‑ QHD / 1x Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB / 2x Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB / 1x Samsung - 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe / 1x Samsung 980 NVMe 1TB / 2 other regular hd's with up to 10 terabyte capacity / Windows 11 Pro 64-bit / Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX Motherboard LGA 1700 DDR5
August 24, 20214 yr Moderator Unfortunately, Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" are not infallible. Consider the first law, just how would we program an adequate definition of "harm?" Edited August 24, 20214 yr by n4gix changed "now" to "not" Fr. Bill AOPA Member: 07141481 AARP Member: 3209010556 Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator
August 24, 20214 yr 6 minutes ago, n4gix said: Unfortunately, Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" are now infallible. Consider the first law, just how would we program an adequate definition of "harm?" AI's for the prevention of emotional harm....... We are all connected..... To each other, biologically...... To the Earth, chemically...... To the rest of the Universe atomically. Devons rig Intel Core i5 13600K @ 5.1GHz / G.SKILL Trident Z5 RGB Series Ram 64GB / GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4070 Ti GAMING OC 12G Graphics Card / Sound Blaster Z / Meta Quest 2 VR Headset / Klipsch® Promedia 2.1 Computer Speakers / ASUS ROG SWIFT PG279Q ‑ 27" IPS LED Monitor ‑ QHD / 1x Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB / 2x Samsung SSD 860 EVO 1TB / 1x Samsung - 970 EVO Plus 2TB NVMe / 1x Samsung 980 NVMe 1TB / 2 other regular hd's with up to 10 terabyte capacity / Windows 11 Pro 64-bit / Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX Motherboard LGA 1700 DDR5
August 27, 20214 yr Author On 8/24/2021 at 6:57 PM, HiFlyer said: The Singularity Institute, and AI researchers worldwide have been working quietly for quite a few years regarding the subject of trying to keep AI's friendly to humanity.... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_general_intelligence Which is a good thing... and when the day comes when we all have (hopefully female and sexy) personal robots, all it takes it one rogue state to not include the safeguards. Probably initially as a weapons system. Don't worry they will say, no more soldiers killed on the battlefield, we will send in our robotic soldiers. Until those robotic soldiers from a dodgy state, with no safeguards, decide to become the master race. 😮😬😩 Cylon's here we come. Err.... second thought, probably not a bad idea. 😉 I am your slave mighty Cylon lady warrior.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.