I see HiFi's X Graphics installs road texturesWill the UTerrain be able to avoid this re-load by XG (if they are unavailable to ASX's list of textures...i.e. have there own names...then it will be OK) IS this the case?al

Well this product looks amazing. I never did get UT for FS9 as it just didn't appeal to me visually, but with FSX and 4x the graphic resolution I was really convinced by what this product appears to be capable of in the demo, and I think this will be a must have.Jeff

If it's just landclass you're after, and you've got UT for FS9, just copy the files over to FSX. It worked for me.

>Allen just replied to a thread on his forum that the road>textures are changeable (Asphalt and Concrete) and>individually as well. Freeway on-ramps can be of one>substance and urban roads another. Here's the thread with a>picture of the configurator: Hmmm, thanks, I will check it out....but I guess I was thinking the problem was less the color or quality of the road surface itself than the fact that it is not bordered by anything. It seems like there should be shoulders or barriers or something so that it doesn't look like a simple strip of asphalt or concrete laid directly on to grass.

Think you've got blurries now.......

Actually, I don't. :)

I am gnawing inanimate objects with excitement.

Again, as the previous poster noted, the textures are changeable. Allen's textures are higher quality than the default, and I believe he said something about working on a couple of different sets to satisfy users. And if you don't like his, you can replace them with others quite easily.Thomas[a href=http://www.flyingscool.com] http://www.flyingscool.com/images/Signature.jpg [/a]I like using VC's :-)N15802 KASH '73 Piper Cherokee Challenger 180

I'm not sure exactly how Allen does it, but, basically, he has an algorithm based largely on road density (among other data points) to figure out how to apply landclass. I have found it to be very good at simulating urban/suburban/lived in areas.Thomas[a href=http://www.flyingscool.com] http://www.flyingscool.com/images/Signature.jpg [/a]I like using VC's :-)N15802 KASH '73 Piper Cherokee Challenger 180

UT for FS9 does not compare to UT for FSX in FSX. I tried using UT FS9 in FSX myself, and I never got it to work satisfactorily for me.Thomas[a href=http://www.flyingscool.com] http://www.flyingscool.com/images/Signature.jpg [/a]I like using VC's :-)N15802 KASH '73 Piper Cherokee Challenger 180

I haven't noticed any increase in blurries related to UT/X. But I didn't really have any to begin with.Thomas[a href=http://www.flyingscool.com] http://www.flyingscool.com/images/Signature.jpg [/a]I like using VC's :-)N15802 KASH '73 Piper Cherokee Challenger 180

Besides the other enhancements the best nightlighting around and sorely needed in FSX.Question: Will the UT ground enhancements conflict with XGraphics?

UT/X is now available from Flight1;http://www.flight1.com/products.asp?product=utxusa#dAnd look! Same price as the FS9 version, with so much more added in.