AWACS

Hi all, sorry if this has been covered previously, but I'm wondering if anyone knows any fixes payware or freeware that removes the taxiway light poles from showing up in the taxiway? Thanks!!

Hello, I thought I had my sim looking real good, but apparently I don't. It does run great though! So, just wondering if someone can point me to the correct setting in MSFS or nVidia that can make the weird texture issue a little better please. Also, other aircraft lights and lights on the ground appear to be squares almost look like big pixels, maybe the two issues are related. I'm sure someone will ask my specs so. AMD 5600X, RTX3070, 32MB RAM, 2 TB SSD Picture attached. Thank so much in advance. https://ibb.co/dtF10Ct P.S. couldn't figure out how to insert an image here so put a link.

I apologize if this has been posted before, but I wanted to share this video from FlightChops on YouTube. I know it's been a topic of contention whether this will be an entertainment title like Flight or an actual simulator and one of the Microsoft people specifically addresses this, I was pleasantly surprised by his answer.

Hey all, Quick question. Does XP11 have accurate Navdata? Does it get updated periodically?

Man I'm getting old.

Question, this 34 inch Dell we're currently discussing does not have a DVI port? As I understand, DVI is better for gaming than HDMI. Does anyone have any comments on that? Thanks.

I'll be there next month! Great shots!

Why would he not visit his support forum?

You were are on a IFR flight plan weren't you? j/k

I'm happy with FSX:SE, though in a new flight sim the most important thing would be that the entire engine be overhauled so that it is better optimized. I just purchased GTA5 for PC, it has cutting edge graphics and my 3- 4 year old computer runs it like a champ on high graphics. A 9 year old flight simulator should run better, but it doesn't, so please above all else, give us something that will run smooth.

Would this be a good plane to purchase? I have the Milviz 310 and am thrilled with the way it flies compared to the real world version, though some switches and stuff are not active. How would you rate this bird, I am an FSX-SE user (I do not use P3D). Great shots as always Ryan!

I thought Aerosoft was working on a simulator too, or was it another company, I can't quite remember.

I'm confused, does FSX get a DC-6 as well or just X-Plane?

It works just fine Rob, for some reason it crashed from free flight mode, but when I loaded another plane, and then switched to the Duke, everything was good. Thanks for checking.

I can report that the Real Air Duke and the Milviz C-310 are working, but my Flight 1 King Air doesn't display a VC as is the situation every time DTG updates FSX.

Tom, in my 11 years as a member of AVSIM, I have had nothing but positive interactions with you. I regret not being able to make the AVSIM social in Chicago a few years ago, it would have been great to meet you person. Thank you for giving us AVSIM, it's been a big part of my life for over a decade. - Jeff

Steve, you said if you have "many" cores you need AM. How many exactly is many? I have a 2600k oc'd to 4.4 HT is off, do I need AM?

Love the shots, but it's a little too green for this time of year.

Know that when you fly the Citation X you're flying a machine that can fly much higher and much faster than most tube airliners today, they are awesome aren't they? And I remember seeing one for the first time in person, they're so sleek and fast looking it's incredible. Good purchase Claude.

Tom, please fight this, go to every treatment center that might have idea, don't stop fighting this, do everything you possibly can to help yourself, I want to hear that you will try. I had a teacher who had cancer twice, it came back when I had his class a couple of years ago, it developed in his liver, lungs, and bone marrow, they did an experimental treatment and he beat it, we want the same for you.

Ah, the old piston Duke, I love it, great shots Ryan!

Brett are you in Michigan by any chance? We have Kalamazoo and Muskegon, both of which are Class D with a TRSA.

Ryan, since you're an ATC guy, I'd be interested in knowing which airports around the country have changed airspace designations over the last five years or so, especially which airports changed from C to B or B to C if there are any, or even D to C. I kind of have a thing for almanac like statistics. Also, is there a place to find this type of data? Thanks! As far as the original question, this may be a little off topic, but I got my PPL at a Class C airport, then got my Instrument and Commercial at a Class D airport located close to a Class C, and I have never uttered the phrase in your title before. To fly into Class D airspace, you are only required two-way radio communications, you shouldn't have to ask for a "transition." Simply establishing radio comm implies clearance into the airspace. This is the same with Class C as well, except that you will need a transponder with mode C in addition to the two-way radio communication.

Hi Rob, I agree with you. Second, I love your products, I'm your customer for life. I was just saying that DTG seems to be doing good things by updating FSX, nothing towards you or anyone else.

After all the negativity expressed towards DTG lately in another thread, I feel that I made a really good purchase decision when I bought FSX:SE in December, it seems that they are keeping promises and actively fixing/refining FSX into something we did not have all these years. Good on ya Dovetail!