July 1, 200718 yr think about it...FS9 only uses one core (if you look at your cpu load, you will see FS9 is only 50% cpu load)so if FSX takes 100% load, shouldn't it run better?food for thought :(
July 1, 200718 yr Well seeing as FSX makes an awful lot more demands on a system I don't see why is should run better than FS9.
July 1, 200718 yr because you are using double the resourceeven though X demands more, it has more to demand fromya know what I mean?
July 1, 200718 yr Hi,As explained many times, FSX will not split the load 50-50. It just sends some tasks to the second core. These tasks were improved in SP1, but it is still not a 50-50 split.Jimhttp://www.hifisim.com/banners/hifi-community-sigbanner.jpghttp://www.hifisim.com/
July 1, 200718 yr FSX demands >10x system resources as compared to FS9, and the CPUs are certainly not 10X. ex-Aces Lead PM, FSX SP1 and SP2 ex-Intel LRB native title enablement, ex Intel Gaming and Graphics Samples PM now Graphics and Multicore PM in Visual Computing Software Enabling.
July 3, 200718 yr Thanks for the ratio Phil. Certainly is implied by performance. With the latest hardware (well, almost latest anyway), I have more trouble believing how well FS9 performs than how limited FSX is. The comparison sure fits your aprox. ratio.Respectfully:RTH
July 3, 200718 yr this is an average, if we really wanted to drill in, we'd have to consider textures, mesh, AI, etc.just to drill in a little:1)we went from 5m to 1m textures, which is something like 16x the number of pixels in the textures2)we went from mesh resolution on the order of 1km to 38m in many places, although some places stayed the same. 3)the road traffic means the AI load is about 4x, 4)media delivered is on the order of 4.5x larger even in compressed format.5)autogen densities are much higher.so 1 order of magnitude more "stuff", 10x as an average, is a good rough rule of thumb when comparing FS9 to FSX. ex-Aces Lead PM, FSX SP1 and SP2 ex-Intel LRB native title enablement, ex Intel Gaming and Graphics Samples PM now Graphics and Multicore PM in Visual Computing Software Enabling.
July 3, 200718 yr Thanks for that phil.SO i need to roughly run 300fps on FS9 to run 30fps on FSX :)that was a joke btw :)I bought FSX today, and my computer is not reading the DVDs :( the laptop reads them, but not the desktop
July 3, 200718 yr Author >>I bought FSX today, and my computer is not reading the DVDs :(>the laptop reads them, but not the desktopDo you have Nero installed perchance?RhettAMD 3700+ (@2585 mhz), eVGA 7800GT 256 (Guru3D 93.71), ASUS A8N-E, PC Power 510 SLI, 2gb Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8 (1T), WD 150 gig 10000rpm Raptor, WD 250gig 7200rpm SATA2, Seagate 120gb 5400 rpm external HD, CoolerMaster Praetorian Rhett 7800X3D ♣ 96 GB G.Skill Flare ♣ Gigabyte 4090 ♣ Crucial P5 Plus 2TB
Create an account or sign in to comment