April 14, 20233 yr The only benchmark that matters to me is the one that approximates my usage. My gut feel is that these new X3D CPUs beat the 13900k in all MSFS scenarios, but the advantage of the V core is diminished by higher resolutions, which tends to level the results. Take away is: don't expect the performance results to map linearly as resolution increases. [email protected] - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)
April 14, 20233 yr 2 hours ago, odourboy said: Take away is: don't expect the performance results to map linearly true, time and next week will tell. the main reason for me to change to AMD x3D, since this will be a gaming-only pc, was the 1/2 power requirements => air cooling = easier to cool. OVER clocking days are OVER for me. and just when we thought the 4090 was the kingpin, the first rumors of the 5090 showing another 2.3x performance increase. prepare for 200 fps and endless debates why 30 fps is all we need. 😃 My only hope is they finally offer also 2.3 x fps with FrameGeneration for VR @ => 70 - 80 fps, otherwise why bother. Jensen Huang knows that he needs to offer at least 2 x performance to pull another $ 2.000 from my wallet. Edited April 14, 20233 yr by turbomax AMD 7800X3D, Windows 11, Gigabyte X670 AORUS Elite AX Motherboard, 64GB DDR5 G.SKILL Trident Z5 NEO RGB (AMD Expo), RTX 4090, Samsung 980 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD 2 TB PCIe 4.0, Samsung 980 PRO M.2 NVMe SSD 1 TB PCIe 4.0, 4K resolution 50" TV @60Hz, VR: Pimax Crystal Light + HP Reverb G2 @ 90 Hz, Honeycomb Bravo Throttle Quadrant, be quiet 1000W PSU, Noctua NH-U12S chromax.black air cooler. 60-130 fps. no CPU overclocking. very nice.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.