odourboy

Reading this thread on my Samsung with Chrome. No problem. Hmmm...

I had a 980 and it kept up, but it was close. I later upgraded to a 1080ti and it takes it in stride.

Nope. That's over my head.

You mean like in real life! LOL

IHMO, go big or go home... in addition to screen size, 'life-size' depends on your VC zoom setting and eye location ([views] eyepoint) and viewing distance from the screen. With my settings, 58" is close to life-sized.

I believe my TO/GA button mapping 'issue' was user inflicted. I've installed P3D V1.1.1 and find that if I enable the A/T switches and press the AT button, I can engage the TO/GA throttle function with my mapped HOTAS button.

Alfredo Torrado & Juan Alcón have presented their case. Colin has responded openly (and showing surprising restraint!) with a proposal and images which should allow this issue to be settled. We're now waiting to hear for a response. I respectfully request that any armchair analysts to restrain their opinions one way or the other until we hear from the OP.

Yep - I haven't upgraded to V1.1.1 yet but I also get this behavior (so this was not something introduced with the update). Clicking the TO/GA key assignment toggles the speed brake arm on and off. (So does the Speed brake arm binding i have set.) Works perfectly for me in several other A/C so I have to point the finger at QW for this. Note: using P3D controls mappings. No FSUIPC involved. Perhaps there's some sort of preference in the 787 somewhere?

I meant, I can't find the equivalent of a VOR nav mode to get the AP to follow a radial. I think Ryan and I are trying to do the same thing... fly it 'old school' VOR to VOR .

When manually setting nav radios for VOR L & R, do you get accurate DME distance info for each? I seem to be getting the same DME distance for different stations. Also, I can't get it to follow a radial course to a station. Not sure how.

A loophole. Excellent!

In retaliation to the 10% tarrif on foreign aluminium products being imposed by the US, I am self imposing 10% VIRTUAL surtax on aircraft add-ons containing software aluminium. Of course, this surtax shall be refunded to the purchaser (me), to offset the additional cost of the virtual aluminium contained in said product. Take that! 🤗

If you're going to bash it, at least get the name right... it's RealLight. 😛

That's an interesting question. I have both. Neither will break the bank, so you can probably end up with them both eventually. I'm pretty impressed with the 787 but I think I'd go with the 717 first (opt-in beta version, which is apparently being officially released very soon). Reasoning: It's a slightly more comprehensive implementation IMHO (and Real Light is excellent), it's had more time to work out the wrinkles and I prefer short-haul A/C. It's really your call though depending on a preference for short haul vs long haul and Boeing type systems vs MDish type (a refreshing change).

No problem in V4.1 (as you obviously read since you nicely reacted to my previous post... thanks!) I see movement of the yoke (and pedals and pedal brakes) in correspondence with movement of my stick and pedals. It hand flies perfectly. I do NOT use FSUIPC in P3D. Hope you get it sorted out.