bobcat999

Yes. No surprises that I couldn't translate it with my limited Finish language skills! 🤪 But we know what the OP meant by the first post. This was actually raised to Asobo in one of the Twitch development sessions and they denied all knowledge of any change but said they would look into it. We hear this a lot don't we. For the English speaking - a Translation... Ilmakuvien tarkkuus refers to the level of detail and spatial accuracy of aerial photographs. It is most commonly defined by Ground Sample Distance (GSD), which indicates the real-world size represented by a single pixel, alongside the image's overall geometrical accuracy for mapping purposes. Hei!

Amongst all the humour, there is a valid point. Yet another recent downgrade. For the sake of the consoles or bandwidth costs? You decide.

Excellent! Thanks for this.

Mad! I really wanted an AA-5, OR a Commander 114. Now we get three versions of the AA-5, and two versions of the Commander 114 at the same time! If we get the B737-200 and DC-10 this year, that would go a considerable way to filling my hangar wish list. 😀

Duplicate.

And yet there is still nothing of any substance here. The video of a single aircraft taxiing like any other aircraft would is absolutely worthless and I am wondering why the OP doesn't understand this. Can anyone tell me what use the video is or what it demonstrates? I actually thought it might be a joke. I hope the OP can cease all this and come back when he has something worth looking at, but by the previous taste of his marketing technique based around teasers and easter eggs, he probably thinks 'look! I am creating a stir!'. 🙄 Currently, this is just a big waste of time and energy all round, whichever side of the argument you are on. The people who are ranting and virtue posturing in defence of the 'product' and/or developer are doing it over vapourware at the moment. Comical in itself!

Like many other Avsim-ers it seems, I'm a bit past 'teasers' and 'Easter eggs', and I really don't like this kind of marketing. I'll maybe come back when there is something tangible.

Looking forward to SU6 beta as well. Unfortunately, no news on that yet.

I had the Captainsim B737-200 (back when Captiansim had different staff/owners and were good), and I absolutely loved it. Their other Boings were quite good as well, including probably the best 707 we have ever had in simming. I would love the B737-100/200 to come along with all those classic airline schemes; a DC-10 would be great as well.

I'm not. They used to be a good company, but things change. Surely they must have recognised the issues before releasing it, just by doing a quick performance test, so then why release it? Anyway, I have been severely disappointed by their products I have bought since MSFS, and I swore I would never buy anything of theirs again, and this kind of thing just reinforces it.

So how did you fix it? Or was it just the usual MSFS randomness?

Well, 'real men' can wear pink and get away with it. 😁 PS. Please don't ask me to define a 'real man' or we will go down the rabbit hole of woke doom! 😆

I can't believe people still listen to him. He says this on virtually every new driver release and recycles all of his usual stuff. Still, he gets the clicks he wants I suppose.

A man called Bruce flying mainly in Australia? Unusual! I agree not as much improvement as in 2020, but it still makes a worthwhile improvement for me, depending on which presets selected of course.

Overwhelming? More modern day hyperbole that people seem to perpetuate these days. The program just does what it is supposed to. I have had it since 2020.