Area

I carefully watch the A330 Driver videos and in this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_p3If-d1Mk between 1:08:56 and 1:09:42, I don't have the same scenery (I'm in ULTRA), would you know if it's the normal landscape or if A330 Driver uses an add-on? Thank you in advance for your opinions

Some time ago, I asked the "pros" for the A300-600R's opinion and I followed their advice and bought it (V1.1.0) see quote above. I fly less than 1 hour in Europe and have had no crashes. Outdoors and especially indoors it is very immersive. The criticism that I "could make" (this is only my opinion) is that it is capricious regarding the altitude constraints on climbs (UK) and on respecting the descent plan. There I always have to watch him like “milk on the fire”; it's often too high, too fast and I'm often standing on the Speed Brakes. Once we have accepted this, it is really pleasant to fly, especially for approaches (ILS-RNAV) in manual mode. NB: I had no problem with the ILS and RNAV approaches (in particular: LFML RNAV31L via DOLIV where the final turn is tight)

Thank you @regis9 , @Cpt_Piett , @JYW , your opinions have made my mind up.😉 NB: Inibuilds can also thank you 😂

Hello, Request for opinion (I am not opening a discussion for what must have already been asked, thank you.) If you "fly" the 737 pmdg and/or A320 Fenix, do you think that the A300-600 V1.1.0 is a plus to have it in your hangar as a "study level" aircraft Thanks in advance.

Which version: Microsoft or Steam?

I understand that wanting to correct a (minor) shift risks disrupting all other calculations. Thanks for taking the time to look, it's really nice. For LFMN, no problem I will do with it. Thanks again for this great software. Best regards

This is it ? Nice Côte D'Azur Airport (LFMN) ★★★★★ Carte, Procédures d'arrivée (STAR) Région: LF Ville: Nice Pays ou Code régional: France Élévation: 11 ft Déclinaison magnétique: 2,7° Est Altitude de transition: 5 000 ft Lever & coucher de soleil: 05:06, 18:11 UTC (crépuscule civil, date réelle) Coordonnées: 43° 39' 35,22" N 7° 12' 54,21" E Infrastructures ALS, Accessoires, Aire de trafic, Carburant, Parking, Procédures, Taxiways, VASI, Équipement de la tour de contrôle Piste(s) avion de ligne, éclairée Météo Station NOAA: LFMN 191730Z 20003KT CAVOK 15/12 Q1017 NOSIG ( VFR) Wind prefers runways: 22L et 22R Plus longue piste d'atterrissage Longueur: 9 709 ft Largeur: 152 ft Cap: 42°M, 222°M Revêtement: Ciment Fréquences COM Tour de contrôle: 118,700 MHz ATIS: 136,580 MHz Parking Portes: 18 Porte GA: 167 Largeur porte: Large Largeur porte: Porte lourde Sources des données Aéroports génériques Y:\Microsoft Flight Simulator\Official\Steam\fs-base-genericairports\scenery\0602\APX49160.bgl Navigation de base Y:\Microsoft Flight Simulator\Official\Steam\fs-base-nav\scenery\0602\NAX49160.bgl Communauté Y:\10-Linker_Community\Apt-00-France\Apt_FRA-LFMN-Nice-Justsim-Simmarket\scenery\objects.bgl Communauté Y:\Microsoft Flight Simulator\Community\navigraph-navdata\scenery\fs-base-jep\scenery\0602\NAX49160.bgl Steam Y:\Microsoft Flight Simulator\Official\Steam\microsoft-airport-lfmn-nice\scenery\microsoft\Nice-Airport\objects.bgl Liens AirNav.com, ChartFox (needs login), FlightAware, FltPlan, OpenNav, Codes des Aéroports du Monde, SkyVector

Strange, strange without I am not calling into question your knowledge and your references, I would like to share with you the LFMN cards file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QRiGxNl9nGyKZkfu9vbuYAUaVaJ8J2IO/view?usp=sharing This map is from December 2023 and it comes from the SIA: https://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv.fr/documents/htmlshow?f=dvd/eAIP_22_FEB_2024/FRANCE/home.html

Hello, I am using LNM 3.0.5 and I am facing a problem when I do a no precision approach with HDG. LNM gives me a runway heading of -1° compared to the official map; example : LFNM card RWY 04 = 43° and RWY 22 = 223° LNM gives me RWY 04 = 42° and RWY 22 = 222° I'm using MSFS 2020 and the LNM library is up to date on MSFS. I think I missed part of the settings, I would be grateful if you could help me, thank you in advance

I followed your advice, I uninstalled LNM and during installation, it asked me for the path. Everything is working fine. A big thank-you.

Hello, I have just downloaded "LittleNavmap-win64-3.0.4-Install.exe", I run the exe, it asks me to accept the contract then to associate extensions. I validate all this, I execute and I get this message: The installation does not take place, at no time does it ask me for the install path. Could you please help me.

Hello, This surprises me. I am connected to GSX, I remove the Jetway without pushback. Then in MCDU > MCDU MENU > MAINT > GROUND SERVICE I put ON Ground Power + Ground Air (ASU). I start engine No. 2 (without APU - NB: special procedure.) . I withdraw Ground Power + Ground Air (ASU) I ask GSX for pushback, it asks me nose to the right or left. I validate a choice and the pushback is done without problem.

Pour éviter toute confusion, concernant la question posée par l'OP, dans aucun des deux scénarios (démarrage automatique ou manuel), il n'est nécessaire de passer de PACKS en position OFF. I think you are forgetting this case: booting without APU and with ASU, FCOM says :

I confirm with 1/ passenger doors to open automatically 2/ Fenix mass and balance > fast loading request 3/ call up the GSX menu and request boarding The cargo doors open and then close during loading. They must be opened manually and closed at the end of loading.

1/ I haven't tested 2/ by going through the GSX menu and not by loading FENIX-GSX, I encounter the same problem. 3/ I haven't tested