vonmar

MSFS2020 FBW A320 PAKT RNAV

MSFS2020 CRJ V2 550/700/900/1000 PAKT RNAV

Noel, You are welcome. Glad to hear you got A/T with V/S working. Good luck with your Self Loading Cargo.

You are welcome. Do not touch anything V/S per my previous post.

Well, that is new information (VNAV in use) not previously mentioned.

You are almost there doing what you want to do. I recreated your situation. I then tested a departure (edit, just a takeoff / no fms etc) using V/S and all ok in the 777 (apart form my tail strike). Do not make your V/S selection before takeoff. Wait until after your 1200’ AGl and cleaned up.

Basically: A/T should be Armed before Takeoff. Throttles / spool up. TO/GA (clickspot e.g.) Then push the throttle all the way forward. Edit: "I selected V/S" Did you also select a V/S (dialed in)?

What was your state initially? For example: Altitude hold 3000' , 220 kt, A/P On, A/T On and a New alt dialed?

No, to answer your specific question, it is not normal. A/T should work in V/S mode. For example, as I previously mentioned, on a hand flown departure.

Hand fly a departure with A/T engaged (speed dialed), Gear / flaps up, A/P ON and V/S works good. A/T speed can be changed as well as V/S.

I looked back and found I had downloaded these procedures in 2018: RNP Approach Procedures for Southeast Alaska for use with the PMDG 737 NGX Workaround waypoints for PMDG and RNP approaches. Alaska Airlines unpublished procedures Still in the Avsim Library. https://library.avsim.net/search/basic/fsxmisc/alaska*

Thanks. Ok, for the ANN transition:

Had a look at KLAX PAKT PMDG737-600 P3D5 RNV M29 and it looks flyable from FMC data

Not talking about both elevations. Just one, the Field Elevation (per your first post). What is the field elevation of CYYC on your chart? CYYC Field elevation information screenshot: Edit: In my first reply I showed you where to check it (17L).

Doug, You are welcome. I was point out what you mentioned: "Why does the field elevation in the backup altimeter read correct at CYYC at 3560'" Is incorrect.