9 minutes ago, g-liner said:

Has anyone given the LNAV 2 a good investigation? How are things like RNP ar approaches using lnav and vnav and also on approach logic? 

I'm not qualified to say whether it's a "good investigation" or not but I can say that it [seems to] handle the curved RNP / RNAV approach at Nice very nicely (LFMN RNAVZ22R or 22L). No complaints on that score 🙂

9 minutes ago, tfm said:

I'm not qualified to say whether it's a "good investigation" or not but I can say that it [seems to] handle the curved RNP / RNAV approach at Nice very nicely (LFMN RNAVZ22R or 22L). No complaints on that score 🙂

Thanks that’s good news. Did you fly it in lnav and vnav and then reset missed the mcp altitude from minimas to missed approach alt (300ft below missed approach alt) and it didn’t capture, ie on approach logic worked? 

 

 

47 minutes ago, g-liner said:

Thanks that’s good news. Did you fly it in lnav and vnav and then reset missed the mcp altitude from minimas to missed approach alt (300ft below missed approach alt) and it didn’t capture, ie on approach logic worked? 

 

 

Yep 🤓 I've done it a couple of times now since ... ahem ... reminding myself how it's done on a 777 😬

On 6/30/2024 at 8:05 AM, g-liner said:

IRL though it’s not usually an either or situations like it is in sim world though? I like having BOTH  the integrated efb and my iPad then you can have approach charts in the iPad and the star and then the moving map ground charts on the integrated efb for landing etc. 

Perhaps in the sim both aren’t possible due to memory issues or something but not having the integrated efb is a shame imho. 

Well it kind of is, in the sense that maintaining multiple types of EFBs is really a waste of money.  You've got one type of device that can only do a few limited things, and another type that can do most anything, so what would be the point of keeping the first type?