February 5, 20251 yr 6 minutes ago, Fiorentoni said: No, they are simply not interested in doing more than needed for their target sales The amount of effort they put into their payware aircraft says otherwise
February 5, 20251 yr Regardless of whatever "study level" means to folks, if one is talking about high fidelity deeply simulated aircraft, then iniBuilds' payware offerings like the A300 easily stands IMO in the same league as the other prominent devs' offerings i.e. PMDG, Fenix, Leonardo, FSL, A2A, etc. And for their upcoming A350 they're aiming for higher standard than their A300. Even the aircraft they've done on contract for the MSFS default fleet are no slouches, and definitely "medium" fidelity at the very least, especially something like the A330 in MSFS 2024. Len 1980s: Sublogic FS II on C64 ---> 1990s: Flight Unlimited I/II, MSFS 95/98 ---> 2000s/2010s: FS/X, P3D, XP ---> 2020+: MSFS Current system: i9 13900K, RTX 4090, 64GB DDR5 4800 RAM, 4TB NVMe SSD
February 5, 20251 yr 49 minutes ago, lwt1971 said: Independientemente de lo que signifique para la gente el "nivel de estudio", si uno está hablando de aviones de alta fidelidad profundamente simulados, entonces las ofertas de software de pago de iniBuilds, como el A300, se sitúan fácilmente, en mi opinión, en la misma liga que las ofertas de otros desarrolladores destacados, es decir, PMDG, Fenix, Leonardo, FSL, A2A, etc. Y para su próximo A350, apuntan a un estándar más alto que su A300. Incluso los aviones que han hecho bajo contrato para la flota predeterminada de MSFS no se quedan atrás, y definitivamente tienen una fidelidad "media" como mínimo, especialmente algo como el A330 en MSFS 2024. I doubt very much that an aircraft as complex as the 350 is high fidelity and less so from Ini. To me Ini aircraft are not high fidelity aircraft, they are somewhere in between, they are not bad products they are similar to Just Flight products but they are in a league far below Leonardo, FSlabs or Fenix.
Create an account or sign in to comment