Aglos77

Since the last SU, I've had several crashes with MFS, so there might be an issue. I've had 7- and 8-hour sessions with XP12, which is more demanding on my hardware, without any problems, so I'm ruling out issues with my computer.

Only one CL650 HotStart in any simulator. If it's exclusively in MFS with permission from FSlabs (I haven't tried their Airbus yet due to budget constraints)Leonardo's MD80 is by far the best add-on I have.

I'm also disappointed that there isn't a version of XP12. I use both simulators, and I hope it really does work better than the current alternatives, which have a lot of extra features but seem to fall short on the basics.

It’s not ignorance, because the community has told them this time and time again over the years. It’s not a matter of prioritizing resources either; the community and third-party developers have asked them to open the API to third parties so they can fix it, but they don’t want to. The weather really isn’t important to them; we have to accept that and make do with what we have.

You don't have to go to Asobo for that kind of marketing; right here in these forums, you can read a lot of hyperbole about this simulator as if everything were perfect. MFS is a good product, no one can deny that but it has many areas for improvement, some of which remain critical.

You have to realize that it doesn't always have to be consoles versus PCs. Microsoft's video game division hasn't been doing very well for quite some time now; perhaps it's not a matter of performance, but rather of conserving resources.

I suspect it's going to be like what happened with 2020,once it became stable, they released 2024.

Maybe I'll buy it in 50 or 60 patches' time and ofcouse at half price...

This is where I always feel like we're using different versions of the simulator. I've never liked Alaska in any simulator, and MFS has always looked terrible in many areas.😀 As for the textures, the latest downgrade has been pretty painful. That, combined with the classic photogrammetry issues found in many parts of the world, has resulted in my A2A Comanche being permanently parked in the hangar.

Hot start tbm900 y a220, Toliss A350, FF 787.

Hot start tbm900 y a220, Toliss A350, FF 787.

That’s why I had my doubts about the 300. I have other products from the developer, and they come with a lot of extras that don’t interest me personally, but I’m not sure what it actually simulates or how it does it, even though I’ve read the manual. I’m not saying it’s better or worse either; personally, based on what I’m reading here, this one might be closer to what I’m looking for in a simulator. In any case, I’ll wait a while to see more reviews—from experience, I know that once the hype dies down for these products, that’s when you really see the pros and cons.

I can't wait to read reviews of this plane and see how it compares to other aircraft of this type in MFS.

Thanks to this developer, I’ve started flying again from time to time in MFS2024. I still don’t understand all the praise for this simulator’s scenery, when semi-desert areas like the surroundings of LEAL look like something out of Jumanji. I don’t understand how this guy can fix the absurd size of the trees, but Asobo can’t.

I was just about to click “buy” – you saved me at the last minute...

If it works well for helicopters and general aviation, it could be a game-changer

That’s true – I hadn’t used the simulator for quite a few weeks. I’ve done two flights of about three hours each with A2A Comanche, and the drop in quality is quite noticeable. I’ve had to turn the texture detail up from high to ultra, and it doesn’t look as good as it used to.

oluto lo que se estaba diciendo. Se trata del paquete completo. Existen otros complementos, como Hotstart Challenger para XPlane, que supuestamente ofrecen una simulación de sistema más profunda. Pero como paquete completo, el Phenom ofrece más, y por eso Emi piensa que es mejor. And how can it know what else it has to offer if we don’t know the full extent of what it actually offers?

The problem is that most YouTubers aren’t honest. And it’s not just in this particular niche; it’s on YouTube in general, because, firstly, if they were, they’d have to pay for the add-ons that developers usually give them for free; if you’re critical, you can forget about receiving any more press copies; and secondly, they’re always chasing sensationalism to get more views. We all know how fanatical this scene has become lately; there are loads of people who, rather than being fans of flight sims, seem more like hooligans. For example, I don’t understand how they can objectively review this particular add-on when there isn’t actually a full list of features provided by the developer. Some, like the 330 driver, already had headlines proclaiming it the ‘best business jet’… Then, if you read the comments on the video, they’re a laugh – graphics take precedence over flight models and systems. I prefer to read people’s experiences in this thread and wait a few weeks for the hype to die down so I can really see whether it’s an add-on for me or not.

It looks great for a Hollywood film, but when it comes to scenes from a real-life simulation, my eyes would never see that in the real world.

I stopped watching flight simulation videos on YouTube a long time ago; I much prefer reading comments from ordinary people on AVSIM or from acquaintances and friends who share this hobby – my mental health has really benefited from it.

Please excuse my English – it’s not very good. I just wanted to say that you’re perfectly entitled to offer constructive criticism, as you’ve done.

I don't want to stick my nose in where it doesn't belong, but I don't think you need to go into so much detail. You're perfectly entitled to speak up if you see something wrong, and if the developer doesn't like it, well, that's their problem – after all, they all depend on us, their customers, for their livelihood.

You guys will have to summarize it for me anyway haha, English is pretty hard for me, and with how fast that YouTuber speaks, I don't think I'll understand a single thing

I wasn’t aware that WT was developing the Embraer Praetor, but from what I’ve read, it’s exactly what I’m looking for at the moment. Thank you very much for the information – it’s invaluable to me.