Rocky

Members
  • Content count

    746
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Rocky

  • Rank
    Member

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    Yes

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://emarciano.free.fr
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Paris, France

Recent Profile Visitors

2,379 profile views
  1. Rocky

    Volumic clouds in fs9

    Hi Hans, Sorry for late reply, I missed your post... I think you're right, but my goal is to code a small module that would dynamically adjust the visibility layer according to your flight conditions. In other words, it would reduce the visibility by creating a short range visibility layer when you fly in clouds, and this layer would disappear when you fly out of the clouds. I think it is technically possible, but so few people are now interested in fs9 that I decided to postpone this development. I may come back to this in a while for my personal use... Eric
  2. Hello everyone, I may be mad or too old on the flight sim area... I think I found an interesting trick but I may be completely wrong here. If so, please let me know. The idea came from thinking about the old versions of flight sim. For those who knew FS5.0 or even FS98, the coulds were modeled as piles of big white cubes. It was horrible but it was realstic in a way because they were volumes, so when you entered into a cloud, you could see nothing outside except the white of the clouds. When the textured clouds appeared (in FS2002 I think), the cloud rendering was much nicer but I never had this feeling of volumic clouds again, it was impossible to fly into a cloud and seee nothing outside. So I tried something: in the weather settings, I created a thick cloud layer and at the exact same place, I create a visibility layer with very low visibility. It worked perfect in fs9: as soon as I entered the cloud (at 2000 feet in this example), I could almost see nothing outside except the white of the clouds. Do you know if weather add-ons do this automatically to give the feeling of volumic clouds? I mean, do you already have this in fs9? I don't use P3D but I guess LM did much better clouds. Any feedback is greatly welcome, I would be happy to know if this idea is interesting or if it has already been covered by other means. Thanks; Eric
  3. HttpX is a very interesting initiative, just like WebSimConnect that I also know. Even if I didn't look at them in details yet, it seems to me that these are developer oriented tools, whereas I would like to provide a ready-to-use system for end users who know nothing about http, sockets, dll... My PFD uses Node.js as a web server with javascript code running on the server side, this is very convenient. I will go further in the development, hoping I cna show you more very soon, I have many ideas for improvement and other usages of this technology. Eric
  4. Indeed, the prototype I show here is a glass-cockpit PFD. I have improved it with airpseed on the left and altitude on the right, it works perfect. I also made a test with a rotating bitmap and it works just as good. It means I can easily develop old-style gauge with background and needle, such as airspeed "badin" indicator or altimeter. I can also make a rotating bitmap like a compass, in fact, any "standard" gauge can be coded using this technology. I will create a new prototype as soon as I find nice bitmaps for this. Eric
  5. Hello, I have developed a PFD prototype that runs in a web browser, so that it can run on a PC or on a smartphone, a tablet, iPad, iPhone, Android, ... I have published a raw video to show that it works well, even on a low-end Android tablet. It is available here: Before going further in the development, I would like to know if this has any kind of interest for you. If so, please let me know, I would be happy to get your opinion about this. Thanks, Eric
  6. Rocky

    EasyFMC for Prepar3D

    EasyFMC, the successful universal FMC, is now available for Prepar3D v2. This add-on lets you plan your flight in a simple and easy way, using the simulator internal database (no need of a specific navigation database). It is fully compliant with the integrated GPS for route display and supports all the VOR, NDB, airports, intersections for route creation. Tested with Prepar3D v2.4 and 2.5. For more information: http://emarciano.free.fr/EZFMC
  7. Rocky

    VFR on Lario, Italy (FS9)

    I'm not sure I am the best beta tester for scenery, but if you think I can help, let's go for it.Eric
  8. Rocky

    VFR on Lario, Italy (FS9)

    Good luck, Guys !! I'm really happy that some people in this world still think about simmers who still fly fs9.I would be glad to help, but my knowledge is on panel and gauges only...Eric
  9. Rocky

    Wilco Airbus

    Hello Guys,Why don't you use the FSUIPC Exporter for this?This is a module especially developed (by me) for the Wilco Airbus Series Vol 1 & Vol 2 (fs9 & FSX) that allows you to control the Airbus systems through FSUIPC offsets. It is described on my web site here : http://emarciano.free.fr/En/FSUIPCExporter.htmMany users are happy about this module. I keep working on it to add new Airbus-specific offsets and future versions will be available for the existing customers with no additional cost.Have a look at it, just in case it might help...Eric
  10. Rocky

    REX Overdrive download?

    http://realenvironmentxtreme.com/overdrivefs9.html
  11. If you are using the A330 from CLS with FS2004, like I did, you may have noticed a problem of memory leak that can lead to an FS crash to the desktop. Having a quick look at the CLS forum immediately brings the solution.The problem is because the CLS installer puts all the common texture files (used in all the virtual cockpits) in the main texture folder of FS2004 and all the livery textures, which are specific to each aircraft livery, are placed in the "texture.XXX" folder of each aircraft. The idea is good because it saves disk space: instead of having the common texture files duplicated n times when you have n liveries, they are stored only once on your disk, a single instance in the main texture folder.Unfortunately, it doesn't work. When you load the aircraft in FS, all the textures appear correctly, it looks like it works, but in fact it causes the memory leak. So the solution is to copy all the common texture files into each "texture.XXX" folder, and here comes file duplication again...Some people said here and there that other aircraft manufacturers could make this work. Some other aircrafts store common texture files in a single folder, and all the specific livery textures are stored in the "texture.XXX" folder. In other words, it seems that some other manufacturers could make the CLS idea work correctly.Do you know an aircraft that uses this technique successfully?Do you know why it doesn't work for the CLS aircrafts of the A330 series?My goal is to have this working because it saves a significant disk space. If this technique works, you can apply it to any aircraft series and save much disk space. I know disk is cheap, but my FS runs on a SSD, which is not that cheap...Thanks for any info :( Eric
  12. Congratulations for doing a so nice display in XML, really amazing !!I am especially surprised by the curve drawn for the flight route.Eric
  13. I also had the same kind of question, and I was wondering if you can define a camera as the default camera?What I mean here is: Can you define a camera (in aricraft.cfg) that is automatically used when the aircraft is loaded, without having to press any key?Eric
  14. That's right... In fact, I am more FS9-oriented, so I forgot the difference between the interior and exterior model...Anyway, you're right, you're not in the VC when in spot view. So my solution is still valid if you switch to VC, then move the eyepoint to walk around the aircraft, but it is very painful compared to spot view.I don't know any way of creating zones that are clickable when in spot view.Eric
  15. I am not an expert in 3D modeling, but I think there might be a workaround here:You can define click zones in the virtual cockpit through XML code integrated in the model itself. So you may have the whole aircraft modeled in the VC model (like Kirk Olsson did for his F16), this would allow you to define click zones on the aircraft.Obviously, defining the aircraft in the VC model might impact the frame rate, so it might not be a good solution. I used the Kirk Olsson F16 a lot and did not notice a bad impact on FPS, so... I don't know.If you happen to test this solution, please let me know if it works.Eric