PelicanHazard

I would personally love if they continue the C90 > B200 up to a 1900C. Been jonesing for one since PMDG's excellent FS9 model.

I believe so.

Depends. If the altitude has a bar under it (underlined), you must be at or above that altitude when crossing the waypoint. If it has a bar over it, you must be at or below that altitude when crossing the waypoint. If the altitude has a bar both above and below it, you must cross the waypoint at that altitude exactly. SILOW has 15000 listed next to it, so you must be at or above 15000 feet at SILOW.

Nope, an -800. The nacelles got crunched a little in the crash. Further proof of NG-ness is the deployed reverser sleeves.

Ah, I can't believe I almost forgot about ATA! They became my favorite airline over the course of four flights.

How's about this one?

That fixed it! Thank you!

Hi,I recently downloaded a repaint off of the file library for the Nemeth EC-135. When I went to load it in FSX, I got this:Light bloom is turned on, but it's not a problem for any of my other repaints. Even other repaints for the EC-135. I've tried deleting the files in the texture folder named "*_spec.dds" and copying a texture.cfg file from a repaint that works, but I can't get the problem to go away. Can anyone shed some light on this?

If made, will buy. Please please please? :(

I aim to please :(

So am I. Southwest uses 737s exclusively to lower costs, so will they discard the 717s immediately, keep them around until they can be phased out with new 737s, or keep them and take an op cost increase?

Combine the Arrow and the Seneca and release the Kraken Seminole.

You can have Narita. I want a really good Kansai! So far there's only a freeware uses-default-objects scenery for RJBB on flightsim.

I'd like ATA to be included. As the company went under two years ago, it's likely to be skipped, but the livery was beautiful (and their 738s were the only NGs I ever flew in).

And for the similar reason of personal expectations, I find FSX to be better than FS9. My computer is able to run FSX well at very high settings (think 80% MyTraffic, road traffic, texture resolution better than 1m, shadowing, light bloom, etc) which all together combine to make it more immersive for me than FS9, even if there's a dearth of add-ons. Truth be told, if the little differences didn't add up to something I liked better than FS9, I'd have uninstalled FSX already.Not that I mind that others don't feel the same. You like what you like, I'm not simming on your computer, and what sim you have doesn't affect my simming at all. So let's enjoy the community and whatever the developers throw at us.tl;dr: Go forth and sim some more.