Library Administrator
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Brian_A_Neuman

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
  • Virtual Airlines

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Tucson, AZ
  • Interests
    Flight Simming (Since 1982)

Recent Profile Visitors

2,202 profile views
  1. Help me out here a little bit. What exactly are you looking for?
  2. Flightsim Original Aircraft is generally reserved for aircraft that were created and uploaded to the site. Repaints of default aircraft will be with the repaints and modifications.
  3. boo

    I remember it vaguely. I will see if I can find it for you.
  4. What’s VRS?
  5. Truthfully, I find this a delightful aircraft to fly. I wont go as far to say that it is perfect...cause it isnt. That being said, I actually find this to be the best modern aircraft offering from Captain Sim. I did a flight from BIKF-KJFK then KJFK-KSFO and found no real dealbreaker issues. The biggest complaint I have seen on these forums is the $75 dollar USD price tag. I am not so naive to believe that this is cheap, cause it isnt. Based on our current employment or income levels will obviously determine if its worth it or not. I will not get into the debate on whether or not this is a good comparison to the QWSim offering as I enjoyed that one as well. But compared to the previous version of the CS757 this one is far and away a much better offering. I am personally a HUGE fan of the 757 (As I used to work for Northwest Airlines back in the day and we had a large fleet of them) and the 757/767 was the last of the pretty aircraft that were built by ANY manufacturer. So for me, the $75 was worth it and is pretty much inline with most offerings this day.
  6. Is that a positive comment?
  7. This is off topic for this thread, however, did you turn you water down from Ultra? That’s the most common form of CTD with FSLabs, having water on Ultra
  8. So far, I have found this plane to be delightful. I am finishing up my 2nd flight with it now and so far, no huge complaints. A few features added would be nice, but all in all, a very nice addition to my V4 hangar.
  9. It is now in the library.
  10. While I havent tried it as I havent used FSX in years, I have not heard people truly complaining. But just keep in mind that FSX is significantly older that Win10 which could always create potential issues.
  11. If you ever get the chance to visit Sedona in person, I highly recommend it. Between the Red Rocks and Oak Creek Canyon which includes Slide Rock State Park, it is amazing (and an easy 4 hour drive from my house).
  12. You would have to do a search within the library. With the thousands of files in the library I can’t keep track of all of them.
  13. Well, I had few if any OOM's with 3.4. However, the difference will be what future addons bring to the table when the virtual memory limit is raised significantly. I have found that performance is smoother with V4. Obviously the slow progress of addons being brought over is a partial reason to stay. But I have seen how much better 64bit is, and am patiently waiting for the remaining addons to be brought or built for V4. This question is quite similar to whether or not go to P3D from FSX. I dont miss FSX one bit, but I understand why its holding on. Its a personal preference.
  14. The GTN Complete series needs to be fully updated. Download and re-install it and it should work fine. Its version 2.04 I believe.
  15. Good evening, I have had an issue with installing .ptp files for a bit. Some authors package several repaints inside an individual .ptp file (ex clean and dirty). My OC will not install any repaints that have multiple ones inside the .ptp file. Is this a known issue or just on my end? It works fine with only 1 repaint in the .ptp file. I hope this makes some sense.