Deimos

Understood. Yeah this solved another problem I had with the new B350. Now it is doable for me with the SDK documentation. This really helped me a lot.

Ah thank you for dragging a noob through here 😄 I thought if the BVar is not collected it would not work. Now it all makes sense. And it works!!! You made my day.

Hmm okay, I cannot find the Handling BVar. Well it was worth a shot. I will see if I can find anything on this. It bothers me to no end that this thing eludes me. I can set it via XMLVar InterSep but that does not do the animation and I like to see things move 😄 Thanks again. https://imgur.com/a/6lgVhsc

Should be the same I guess here then. It is the template that has that. So that would go in the setter, right? And then DeIce_Engine1 in the getter? That never showed a 1 on myLVar for me though. I'll give it a shot. Thank you for your reply

Hey, has anyone sucessfully mapped the inertia separator for the 208B Analog? I am stumped on this and could not get it to work <UseTemplate Name="ASOBO_HANDLING_Lever_InertSep_Template"> <NODE_ID>HANDLING_Lever_InertSep</NODE_ID> <ANIM_NAME>HANDLING_Lever_InertSep</ANIM_NAME> <PART_ID>HANDLING_Lever_InertSep</PART_ID> <WWISE_EVENT_1>trimlock_lever_on</WWISE_EVENT_1> <WWISE_EVENT_2>trimlock_lever_off</WWISE_EVENT_2> <ANIM_LAG>100</ANIM_LAG> <INVERT_SWITCH_ON_CONDITION>True</INVERT_SWITCH_ON_CONDITION> </UseTemplate> This seems to be the used template. I tried the (L:myLVar, Bool) (B:DeIce_Engine1, Bool) != if{ (&gt;B:DEICE_ENGINE1_TOGGLE) } mapping with sync but in that scenario myLVar does not even get set. Maybe I am doing something wrong there already. I am stumped and any help would be appreciated.

If you mean stuttering in the sim while looking around try to set the off screen terrain pre caching higher (preferably to ultra). No Stutters for me on pc that is arguably lower spec than yours (5800x, 3080) I had the most horrific stutters when flying the CJ4 the other day (normally flying low and slow) and could not make heads or tails from it. Then all I changed was that setting, that I somehow hates to low. Difference is night and day. Needs more resources, sure. But is not constantly causing loading lag, because of you looking around with TIR

Interesting. I set Off Screen Terrain Pre-Caching to Ultra to get rid of the stutters while looking around and it worked a treat. As this essentially removes the unloading and reloading of objects.

I thought I might necro this, I just bought the https://www.facebook.com/lukeclip/ lukeclip v2. It works as a wireless track clip pro. I was in the same boat about eye tracking because I got annoyed with the cable on my wireless headset from the track clip pro. I got this instead of the eye tracking, mounted it to the side of my headset which has a magnetic sideplate. Now I can take the emitter off for charging and everyday headset use and my track IR has seen quite a lot more use.

Yeah, was thinking about that as well. But it is the same thing as the flight1 was back in the day. Hampered by not being navigraph capable and too expensive in the garmin subscription.

Yeah me too (albeit two smaller ones). And it works a treat with the FMS of the CJ4 for example. But wanting to fly something like the TBM with its touch screens, no dice 😞 I can undock and move the native touch panels to the touch screens but not use them for input... I cannot fathom why they chose to not implement this and even less why there is a need to not forward the basic flight controls once the mouse is over said docked out panels either...

I would so love to use my GTN 750 on an external touch screen or have the G3X Controls docked out and touch those or whatever touch sensitive interface that is in the game. However while air manager works flawlessly and touch works on docked out windows in FSX, P3D and Plane it does not in MSFS. Controls lock up and joystick inputs are not recognised anymore, when MSFS loses focus to its own windows (not other ones like a browser on a different screen mind you) and the touch input is not recognised. I made a bug report on zen desk but never heard of it again, I made a bug post but that garnered like 10 votes. Is no-one suing touch screens or am I just doing something wrong and it works for everybody else who does?

No. And no need to be snide. It is just so tiring to see planes being revealed months before their actual release, potenitally delayed and then they turn out not so much as they are made out to be. A pattern that is nicely followed for MSFS quite often now. Rather have two or three weeks notice for an actual nice product that then gets released.

Can't fly early notice's though.

Lol, okay. Come back in August then. Tired of hype, need to see more actual good planes for the sim. /Thread.

Also lorbies AAO can do that, even over network. Though not as touch compatible as Air Manager. But also not as expensive.

Already have that. But that is too much airliner most of the time. I'd rather have a more get up and go plane.

So when will there be more of this breadcrumb trail? I really need to have a DC-3 in my sim....

The availability of switches for hardware interfacing and the visual representation in the VC are also not in the update 😞 That is the killer for me, as well as the not undockable GPS. Why on earth...

Well I did not mind the sound to much. I have not gotten an answer however if they plan on fixing the non moving switches when used by hardware. And MK said they'd only "consider" whatever this means in this context to make the GNS undockable. And after all his other posts /great hardware support, LVar lists will be there, never seen before fidelity, trimwheel cut for xbox memory issues) I have issues believing anything he says. These were the dealbreakers for me. It does not work in my home cockpit this way. The square wheels I could not give two hoots, I cannot see them anyway... I really wished for this thing to have been good. The sim is so lacking in the mid size plane department, it is not even funny anymore. I have very little interest in tubeliners or fighters and after the umpteenth bush tail dragger this was very much anticipated by me with the JU having been such a disappointment and as of yet unfixed as well. Sad state of affairs 😞

And a not a condescending or vague but a helpful one at that. 😉 I was amazed by the Christmas Eve Update. I would have never anticipated or expected that. It just has a whole different feel of engagement with the customer and identification with your product. This also echoed through the MSFS forums. Same with Flying Iron for example. Then you see AH and Aerosoft being stuck in the FSX days of sitting on their high horses handing you down what you have to like. EDIT: And it goes to show that a fairly non toxic community relies on both sides. And that quality is appreciated. Even with bugs. A lot is in the delivery of the fixes. Both in communication as in actual fixing. And owning up to it. I am really impressed by the "oops we did it wrong" attitude and the amount fo constructive feedback from the community to remedy the issue then. It is just an entire different climate with some companies. And since it is the same customers at least part of the ball must lay in the devs corner. Then you have posts in the Aerosoft forum akin to "I feel drained by the negative feedback, bad community" where I just think, if they deliver a better product and don't talk down to the guys purchasing it and maybe they will find the people engaging them differently as well.

Sure, a bugfix. And why not. Errors are bound to happen. That is why I did not include the bad sound transitions in my original post as this seems to be a genuine error. But it is one thing to fix some bug but another to have a whole host of things obviously not working and judging by the dev's posts with their full knowledge. These are no errors, this is wilful behaviour. And I would not condone that if it were my work. You cannot sell Cheeseburgers without cheese and expect noone to object.

Not for nothing, but I've got an idea: How about releasing software that is mature and thoroughly thested. And contains the features you promised like the lvar lists for your promised great hardware support. With a functioning autopilot and the great systems modelling you said it will have. And where flicking default hardware switches like the generator are actually reflected in the appropriate action in the sim. Or with a working HSI. Or an undockable GPS like in every other dang plane on the market for fs2020. Even the default ones. I know it sounds silly. But would that not be a great idea to do that before you try to get money from your victi... err customers. Not that piece of banana ware that it is right now. You cannot tell me they did not know. And if they'd had marketed it as "early access" or whatever bugridden alphas are marketed as I'd have understood. But they did not. This is the product. Nowhere in the announcements did it say it is not feature complete. How can anyone approve of that. They will not accept you just paying part of the money for it you know. But you gladly accept getting only part of the product.

Thank you for your reply. What bothers me the most about stuff like this is that I get drawn into a conflict I am no part of. My system security gets lowered because someone else steals from you. Not trying to troll or anything. Just trying to explain, why this is still a little bit of an issue for me. I see your reasoning, I am just sad that I am the one having to bear the burden for someone elses doing. I thank you for your openness though. You could just have said nothing about it. Putting it right there in the product description was the right move!

And it constantly communicates with your servers then? If so this may be an avenue of attack onto my system. Your servers get compromised and I have a program on service level running on my machine, that can be misused. Is it run with user or admin rights? If the former that would do a lot to alleviate concerns. Could you please elaborate on that fact? That would be much appreciated.

There is the slight difference in scope and experience though. Also these are central providers for multiple developers. This is for one plane specifically. I do not like what this Is going. And you have 0 idea what it is doing.