Keirtt
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
-
-
Are you sure you're not using another add-on such as TriTriSim? See my image below from their website. It looks like a feature they offer is a wing fade effect. Which is super cool by the way - but I also want to stop any confusion from folks thinking this was something native that came with SU6, because it definitely is not and this a thread about SU6.
-
I've done a dozen or so flights in MSFS 2024 with SU6, and yet to run across any clouds where the wing was obscured. I agree it was always something neat to think about, but I'm still confused. Is this just a fluke or are you recreating this in all clouds? Is this something you're seeing because of your add-ons?
-
-
Funny you should ask. I did a long haul 9 hour flight there last night using the PMDG 777. Not a single stutter. Even commented to my buddy about how smooth it was. What hardware do you have?
-
I had this problem in SU5. The dozen or so flights I've done, it appears resolved. SU6 has been amazing for me. See this post for my comments: https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/700109-sim-update-6-v18140-now-available/page/6/#findComment-5812496 And no - didn't do any changes other than updating.
-
Funny, I had this problem in SU5 and I think it’s much better in SU6
-
Just did a 16 hour long haul with the inibuilds A350-900 ULR from LAX-WSSS. For me, SU6 has been an amazing update. My performance stayed the same all the way through the flight, including touchdown. Rock solid 116 fps with FGx4 and AutoFPS. What was even more impressive for me were no stutters anywhere on final or touchdown - something that I was being plagued with in SU5. Also, and this could be completely made up in my head, but I would agree with what some others have said about the clouds appearing improved. I did a flight yesterday evening before the long haul into DEN, and there were some storms in the distance. The lightning even appeared more believable. Again, could absolutely be a placebo, but there seem to be some improvements there. Outstanding performance is really what has blown my mind. Looking forward to testing some other airports, but at least it's long haul stable.
-
From their discord:
-
Same news that it has been. It’ll be a future paid expansion.
-
Still doesn’t change my opinion. I said what I said and stand by it. See my reply above. 🤷♂️
-
The second I see those stock/generic default planes in marketing material, I immediately lose confidence. 🤷♂️
-
Exactly this!
-
That might be the case that it's loud in real life, but the headphone simulation should tone that down considerably when it's activated, but it doesn't. Just as loud before and after. The Echo19 sounds for the Cessna 172 are identical to that. The ground noise is just as loud with the headphone simulations as is it is without them.
-
Here is my personal opinion on this product. I'll preface this by saying I have no intention of debating everyone who disagrees with me. If you love this airplane, that's great. I have friends whose opinions I respect that genuinely enjoy it. This review simply isn't for you. If you're already offended by that, I'd recommend stopping here. To me, the product is mediocre at best. The launch was an absolute train wreck. Even before release, the streamer previews, the drama, and the team's responses on Discord left a bad impression. It wasn't a great look, and it gave me a sour taste from the beginning. Normally I have a pretty good sense of whether an aircraft is going to click with me, but my curiosity got the better of me this time. The airlines and routes the A220 opens up were enough to convince me to give it a shot. Unfortunately, once I actually started flying it, the disappointment came quickly. The first thing that stood out was the sound package. I think Tyler from Echo19 is a genuinely good guy, but I've always felt his sound work falls short of some of the best products on the market. The engine sounds are decent, but everything else feels flat, exaggerated, or simply lifeless. The airplane never feels alive. Landings lack the rattles and vibration that help sell the illusion, while extending the landing gear sounds like you're hanging your head out the window. It's completely overdone. Beyond that, nothing about this aircraft feels groundbreaking. The EFB is essentially the same basic iniBuilds tablet we've had since the A300. The systems depth feels fairly shallow, and the overall package just comes across as inexpensive despite carrying a $66 price tag. Performance also left a lot to be desired. I experienced multiple simulator crashes, and I ran into some odd automation behavior as well. Just tonight, after installing version 0.3, the aircraft began accelerating rapidly during descent while in V/S with autothrottle engaged at around 6,500 feet. Disconnecting the autothrottle immediately corrected the issue. Reengaging it worked for a while, but the problem returned on a 10 mile final. At that point, I simply closed the simulator. If someone asked whether I recommend buying this aircraft, my answer would be no. In my opinion, its biggest selling point is that it's an A220. It gives the community access to new airlines and routes that we haven't really had before, and I think that's carrying a lot of the excitement. Beyond that, I don't find it particularly impressive. If you love it, I'm genuinely glad you're enjoying it. For me, I'll be looking forward to upcoming releases like the BB 757 and the iniBuilds A380. As for the Synaptics A220, it's headed to the hangar, and I don't see myself coming back to it anytime soon.
