Grzegorz

Thank you indeed the question of VATC vs PATC is pointless. As for AFCAD, for the most part I have it fairly up to date, made possible by the AIG people publishing an update for many scenery. Minor changes, I can do on my own as well and I think here there will be no problem with VATC requirements. Overall, thanks to your information, I am more and more inclined to try this program. The AI traffic management is very tempting for me. Thank you very much for all the information

Thank you Unfortunately, in the sim market only few publishers understand what a user's personal opinion is. I simply do not respond to such comments, here I would have to present the same level, and this is something I always want to avoid.

vadriver Thank you for your constructive response.

And then there's the most important thing I forgot, how does the VOX ATC handle time acceleration - I use 4x

Hello everyone Staying with the P3D (v45), I have been carrying around the idea of buying a VOX ATC for some time now. I'm currently using PRO - ATC, but not SR since the developer gave up on downloading weather data from AS and was unresponsive to requests to bring this option back, and it's now basically a dead product. I also tried PF3, and FSHUD in the early days of development - here I still managed to use the Flight1 refund option because I wasn't happy with that program; mainly the low number of aircraft on the airfield and not operating on acceleration (unfortunately that's the only way I can do flights in my spare time). I am considering VOX ATC, which I have never used before. It's also tempting to use the program to manage AI traffic - that's why I tried with FSHUD. Here, however, from what I have read it is a program for voice communication, I prefer the so-called button, however, and would have questions: 1. is it possible to use VOX ATC completely without voice communication - I know there is an FO option, but is it possible to completely do ‘button controls’ without using voice communication e.g. first contact . Yes I only fly liners and always the communication is managed by FO and I don't want to be involved in this 2. does VOX ATC managing AI limit the number of aircraft (this is what FSHUD did) and airports are basically empty e.g. using FSHUD at EPWA I had 5 aircraft where without about 30-40, does VOX ATC also do this or does it use what I have installed - there is a lot of it 3. is there any point in using PRO - ATC to switch to VOX ATC; leaving aside that PRO - ATC does not manage AI traffic What are your impressions if you use this program? Thank you in advance for any answers and suggestions Grzegorz

It's available on simbrief. I don't test it, but there is a lot airctaft.

Try this. It works very well for me. https://www.avsim.com/forums/topic/589642-new-atc-and-airport-operations-application-testing/

Sorry i can't compare with EFB, becouse I don't use it in PMDG - i use P3D.

If You are 738 drivers try this - its payware, but works greate. I have standard one year subscription. https://www.virtualperformancetool.com/ It's performance tool and W&B calculator with loadsheet etc, and there is PMDG profile. Best regards Grzegorz

I have a problem with this website on my phone. On my PC works well, but most on my phone. Best regards Grzegorz

Thank you. I think I'll hold off on the fshud though, basically I'm happy with PF3. Here the plus is the simulation of the Atlantic flight procedure. Best regards Grzegorz

Hello, I used fshud at the very beginning. The program did not cope with AI traffic - at airports emptiness for example at JFK I had literally 20 planes. At my home EPWA literally 5. Without fshud as it should be - I got a lot of AI traffic (AIG, MAIW, etc.) Also, with fshud I had no GA or military traffic at all. Another thing that is important to me is fshud in time acceleration stopped working - zero interaction (now I use PF3). How does it look now in fshud? Does the program still limit the number of planes on the airport and how does it work in time acceleration. Honestly, I had high hopes for this program and it's been a while since it's been on the market, so it might be worth revisiting. I use P3D v45 Best regards Grzegorz

Hello sincerely, I have such a problem with QW787 that when I turn on the landing lights the HUD becomes very bright. I have the latest version with SP4. I returned to the 787 after a long break and honestly, I don't remember if this problem occurred. Now QW has basically ceased to exist and their forum has been dead for a long time. Generally about SP4 is the ability to control the brightness of the HUD, but with every time I turn on the landing lights the HUD is very bright, which at night strongly interferes. Turning off the midsummer makes it dim again. Maybe someone of you had a similar problem and managed to deal with it. I also have an add-on from //42 787 immersion.I am using P3D V45 Best regards Grzegorz Pawlik

Hello, this looks impressive. I have a question because the module is described in the description on your website, you can get autogen without photoscenery. I would be very interested only in autogen for Poland - by the way, are your additions in P3D v45? How can I get the opportunity to download your autogen for Poland? Best regards Grzegorz

Thank you. I didn't notice there was a trial version. Will try in my spare time how it works. Before that, I would appreciate your feedback. Grzegorz