Jump to content

CaptainAddOn

Members
  • Content Count

    45
  • Donations

    $0.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

56 Good

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    Yes
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    none
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Update to navaids outside a major release is a very pleasant surprise. That has not historically happened. I wonder if we’ll be getting more frequent navdata updates.
  2. Damian Clark - I am sure you are miles ahead of me on understanding the implications here, but early indications are P3D may be moving toward a more regular cadence of small incremental updates, and based on their versioning will still eventually get to 6.1, 6.2 etc. If active sky is just failing because it checks the version and doesn’t recognize it, have you given any consideration to just checking the first two parts of the software build (I.e. 6.0.x.x passes regardless of what the x’s are, but 6.1.x.x fails until you have had a chance to check things aren’t broken)? May save you a ton of grief (although I can’t speak to whether there is risk here). p.s. thank you for supporting v6 - clear skies on my end 😊
  3. I think that you will find v6 a performance upgrade from v4, although possibly a small downgrade/parity with v5. If history repeats, v6 will probably get more performant as more point releases come out.
  4. I once heard an LM employee give a talk where he stated that the models in the box with P3D are not even made by LM. Apparently they outsource them to avoid any potential for sensitive data to make its way into the public product and they have much better models for their military customers we will never get our hands on.
  5. Orbx global, Active Sky, and primarily PMDG Boeing add-ons, with some occasional diversions into GA freeware or even the default aircraft. PMDG 737ngxu is my daily driver.
  6. You are not criticizing P3D here though. You are criticizing PMDG for not supporting their products. Apples to apples (default to default), P3D v6 is a clear step up over P3D v5. I for one have pretty much all add-ons I fly regularly working perfectly.
  7. Some really nice examples over on the Prepar3D forums: https://www.prepar3d.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6325&t=148248
  8. Much better skies/clouds, improved terrain mesh, accumulating snow/rain, better performance, tunable color/lighting, more frequent updates I have this pet theory that anyone who is dragging their feet and saying "it's v5.5" has not actually bought v6 and tried it for themselves...
  9. My take is that those 500 developers are very, very likely to be almost entirely made up of content developers at Asobo. What we really know about MSFS 2024 is: - The engine is pretty much the same. Good enough for backwards compatibility at least. Hard to quantify what they really mean when they say the significantly enhanced engine. - They are leaning into career mode, which implies a lot of content will be provided in the box (specific sceneries set-up conducive to career tasks + aircraft in the box that are needed to complete these missions, minimally) - They are dramatically increasing the amount of content that will be streamed and going even further cloud first. I take this to mean there will be a massive amount of content developed to the point where they don't just need to stream terrain/scenery, but even are getting to the point where they need to stream textures, aircraft, etc. to make it accessible on console and most PCs. Overall, a nice thing for the community, but for third party developers, I would be very, very scared that Microsoft will pull the rug out on my current active development efforts. I think the slow progress is because everyone is reluctant to staff up due to this risk. There already are many instances where aircraft shown in the 2024 trailer look to effectively be clones of existing popular payware aircraft on the marketplace. If Microsoft puts out the perfect sim with a standing army of 500, then what role do add-ons play in that?
  10. I’m sure this is a bigger than normal update. We know they were missing some textures and also the entire C-130 model, plus who knows what else. A whole lot faster than downloading and installing the whole thing over again at least. Update worked smooth for me - appears to not have broken anything.
  11. Moderators - recommend closing this one. People can readily find the content in question and the trolls are out in full force.
  12. You in some kind of beta/early release program? I didn’t get an update and my C-130 still doesn’t work. Hoping this is indicative that all these fixes are imminent.I think v6 is great, but would be nice to get more frequent updates/enhancements.
  13. LM offers a 14 day money back guarantee, so you can just buy it, try it, and decide whether to keep it within 14 days or to request a refund.
×
×
  • Create New...