What is the current update status of this product for fs9? I read there were many problems and disappointed customers at the release time. How is the current FPS performance compared to the older Cloud9's Amsterdam?Thanks,Dirk.

Does anyone use it in fs9?Thanks,Dirk.

I do and it performs much better than the C9 version.Checking out the Aerosoft forums is the best place to get the gist of what is wrong with the FS9/FSX versions. Lots of complaints there but to be honest I find it much better than the older C9 version.Biggest issue for most is the runway use issues, something very hard to fix in FS9.....

Can't remember ever having had issues with the scenery, great piece of work, much better than C9's.As for runway usage, you just need good Afcads. :(

I wrote the Avsim review. If you didn't read it, you might still wanna do so. In short: It's a very good-looking scenery, no doubt. It's not perfect, as always, but if you are not nitpicky, you probably won't even notice most faults. I like the addon, I just wish it;'s integration with UTE or NL2000 would be better.

The biggest showstopper with this scenery is that VC textures of sophisticated planes such as iFly or LDS start to blur\dissapear or behave erratically during the night time. I have all the updates installed + manually added alpha channels to DTX3 textures and still having this problem.

Can't remember ever having had issues with the scenery, great piece of work, much better than C9's.As for runway usage, you just need good Afcads. :(

Mike,Have you ever had a problem that I described above?

I'm buying this scenery shortly.Thank you for your comments, they are very helpful.Cheers,Dirk.

I agree with the above post regarding the VC textures and nighttime..I had a total mess using the PMDG MD-11 at night with textures getting all scrambled up. Top-down view gave me some issues as well. I have since received a refund.RobertPS - I am using FS9