March 4, 201115 yr This thread should be sending shivers down Aerosofts spine!On your glowing recommendations I think I'm going to invest in all of the UK2000 sceneries. They make my local airport too which is great!
March 4, 201115 yr Well I have Aerosoft Heathrow, and dont have frame rate problems with it. But I only recently discovered UK2000 and have bought Bristol;Manchester;Gatwick and Stanstead. All very good. Highly recommended.Peter Peter Schluter
March 5, 201115 yr On your glowing recommendations I think I'm going to invest in all of the UK2000 sceneries. You won't regret that decision. Gary's work is top class. Gavin Barbara Over 10 years here and AVSIM is still my favourite FS site :-)
March 9, 201115 yr Hmmm, that's all rather annoying 'cos I have the Aerosoft version and have used 5 credits to 'AES' it. If I bought the UK2000 version I'd lose that plus the price of the UK2000 on top. Maybe someone who has seen both might elaborate as to why UK2000 is better?? (I set fps to 36fps max and get that at Aerosoft EGLL too, even with 90% traffic). :)Martin Martin Stebbing, EGLF (UK)
March 9, 201115 yr The first and foremost reason is that the UK2000 version represents Heathrow in it's current state, unlike the Aerosoft one which is based on the airport circa 2004. A lot has changed. Other than that, performance, detail in lighting textures and moddelling is all far better.No need to take anyone else's opinion though; just download the demo and see for yourself. i7 2600k @ 5.1Ghz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600Mhz, EVGA GTX 580 @ 950MHz, OCZ Vertex II 240GB, ASUS Xonar DG, Thermaltake Toughpower XT 875W PSU, Antec KÜHLER 620 W/C, Corsair 600T SE White My FS9 Screens - http://fs9screens.blogspot.com/ Callum Richardson
March 9, 201115 yr I just recently purchased the UK2000 Heathrow Xtreme v2 and its very good. Although I do not have the Aerosoft version of Heathrow, I do own their Munich, Amsterdam, Paris Olgy software packages. Although Munich is my current favorite, I would reinvest in the purchase any of the four again. The Heathrow package is so new to my sim that I have only made a couple of take offs and landing with the airport. The other night, flying a GA aircraft, I landed on 9L at Heathrow. Although I was flying a GA I asked for parking at the gate and was assigned a spot just east of Terminal 4. The routing to my gate allowed me to see much of the airport as I traveled to my assigned gate. My first impressions of the UK2000 package are very positive.I also picked up their free versions of Gatwick and Glasgow. I make one purchase of an addon a month. After seeeing three example of their work I plan on purchasing their full Gatwick package next month.Tom
March 10, 201115 yr I just recently purchased the UK2000 Heathrow Xtreme v2 and its very good. Although I do not have the Aerosoft version of Heathrow, I do own their Munich, Amsterdam, Paris Olgy software packages. Although Munich is my current favorite, I would reinvest in the purchase any of the four again. The Heathrow package is so new to my sim that I have only made a couple of take offs and landing with the airport. The other night, flying a GA aircraft, I landed on 9L at Heathrow. Although I was flying a GA I asked for parking at the gate and was assigned a spot just east of Terminal 4. The routing to my gate allowed me to see much of the airport as I traveled to my assigned gate. My first impressions of the UK2000 package are very positive.I also picked up their free versions of Gatwick and Glasgow. I make one purchase of an addon a month. After seeeing three example of their work I plan on purchasing their full Gatwick package next month.TomHi,I have Aerosoft`s Heathrow and I found I suffered a frame rate hit, fluctuating beteen 10 and 16 fps. Having bought UK 2000 Extreme (and subsequently all of their airports) Aerosoft has been relegated to the external HD ! I get 29.9 fps, maxed at 30 fps. with Heathrow and Gatwick Extreme.Dave
March 10, 201115 yr Well, I reckon all things considered I'll stick with Aerosoft EGLL for now - I get good frame rates there as I said, and having added AES already, it's going to be a bit of an unwanted expense to change now. May have a look at the UK2000 demo though - I have several of their other airports including Gatwick v3, and they are certainly excellent.Martin Martin Stebbing, EGLF (UK)
March 10, 201115 yr I now have airport packages that were developed by Fly Tampa, BluePrint Simulation, Aerosoft, UK2000 and various freewate authors. With AI traffic set to 80% my framerates stay at my sim max of 35 FPS. I also have detailed clouds set at their max and they can be somewhat more of a problem on a highly overcast day than any of the airports. I think that one of the keys surrounding any of any of the more detailed airport packages is to find a framwrate that your system can handle and leave it as your operating baseline. Also, one of the things that used to slow my sim was the scenery.cfg file being out of order or missed numbered. There is a program available on this site that is capable of "cleaning up", your scenery.cfg file. I am not certain of the name of the download, but the name of the executable is FSTscenery.exe. This fix also shorts the sims load time once you select your flight.Tom
March 13, 201115 yr I would choose UK2000 w/o any reservations. It looks great, offers high fps, and UK2000 is a great company to deal with. Fulcrum One Yoke / FSProjects Airbus Side Stick, Honeycomb Bravo, Slaw Device RX Viper V2 Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, PNY RTX 5080, 48GB RAM
Create an account or sign in to comment