August 11, 201114 yr I think it's time for me to make the step, and leave FS9 for FSX. I reallt want to fly the new 737 NGX. In order to do this, I have to make some updates to my computer and switch from AMD phenom to Intel sandy bridge. I have already decided to get: Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V Pro RAM: Corsair Vengeance 2x4gb 1600MHz CL8 (I know CL7 or CL6 is to prefer for FS but it's almost impossible to find that high performance RAM in Sweden) Then I have two options: 1) get an i7 2600k and a GTX 570, and keep my WD caviar black 640gb for FSX and my Spinpoint F3 1tb for OS and programs. 2) get an i5 2500k and a GTX 560ti, and buy a 120gb SSD for FSX and a 60gb SSD for OS and programs. I already have a CPU cooler, PSU and case. What is the best choice?
August 11, 201114 yr Would go with the i5 2500k, GTX 570 and one SSD P3D v4.5 MSFS2020 Hisense 50" 4K TV Ryzen 9600x 64gb DDR5 6000mhz, Asrock B650m HDV/M.2 Gigabyte 16gb 9070XT, Thermalright Aqua Elite 240mm 2TB NVMe Boot/FS2020 Drive, 2TB NVMe P3D Drive. Saitek Yoke, Pedals, Radio Panel, Switch Panel, 2 x FiPs
August 12, 201114 yr Would go with the i5 2500k, GTX 570 and one SSD Agree! Don't forget to get a good cooler. MSFS
August 12, 201114 yr Would go with the i5 2500k, GTX 570 and one SSDWhy do you prefer the i5 rather then the i7?
August 12, 201114 yr Why do you prefer the i5 rather then the i7? No advantage for FSX in having the i2600k, only difference is Hyper Threading, which FSX and most other games don't use. Better to save the $100 and put it to use elsewhere P3D v4.5 MSFS2020 Hisense 50" 4K TV Ryzen 9600x 64gb DDR5 6000mhz, Asrock B650m HDV/M.2 Gigabyte 16gb 9070XT, Thermalright Aqua Elite 240mm 2TB NVMe Boot/FS2020 Drive, 2TB NVMe P3D Drive. Saitek Yoke, Pedals, Radio Panel, Switch Panel, 2 x FiPs
August 12, 201114 yr Has anyone considered that the larger cache in the i7 2600K could be useful? "Regardless of the nonsense you may read in forums unlike typical games the larger cache is in fact beneficial to FSXIntel smart cache technology is used by the processor for read-ahead operations which optimizes memory address calls as the system is used, and since FSX is a memory subsystem nightmare in programming design (as Phil Taylor has confirmed) the larger/more advanced the proc cache and its ability to recall data from memory the better the result. I would spend the money on the 2600K" http://www.simforums...topic38910.html
August 12, 201114 yr Author Maybe that's right about 2500k vs 2600k, that the larger cache is useful for fsx. I think I have decided to get the GXT 570 and not GTX 560ti. But I'm still not sure about if I should go with SSDs. I think I need two in that case. 120gb alone is too small for win7, programs, fsx and addons I think.
August 13, 201114 yr The larger cache has not frame benefit, as has been tested. But there's no harm in going with the i72600k (although some have said decrease in performance; having to turn of hyper threading (conjecture)). Ruben Schuckit i5 2500k 4.5GHz GTX 560 Ti 8GB memory
August 13, 201114 yr Take one OCZ 120 Gb Vertex 3 SSD for W7+FSX the rest of the stuff park somewhere else on a TerrabyteRead HERE Jan Vaane - KLM149 aka PH-JVA
August 13, 201114 yr Author Take one OCZ 120 Gb Vertex 3 SSD for W7+FSX the rest of the stuff park somewhere else on a TerrabyteRead HERE What about using both SSD and mechanical when it comes to choose between IDE or AHCI? can I set IDE for the mechanical and AHCI for the SSD, or should I set both to AHCI?
August 13, 201114 yr Some operating systems like Windows 7, do not configure themselves to load the AHCI driver upon boot if the drive controller was not in AHCI mode at the time of installation. This can cause failure to boot with an error message if the SATA controller is later switched to AHCI mode. For this reason, Intel recommends changing the drive controller to AHCI or RAID before installing an operating system.[1] On Windows 7, this can be fixed by booting in legacy mode and changing the registry.[3] Check your bios if the settings are available [1] http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/imsm/sb/CS-015988.htm[3] http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922976 Jan Vaane - KLM149 aka PH-JVA
August 14, 201114 yr SSD won't give you much of an FPS increase but will help with load times. Consider the Gigabyte Z68s and definitely go with the i5 2500k. Both optimists and pessimists contribute to our society. The optimist invents the airplane and the pessimist the parachute. ~Gil Stern
August 19, 201114 yr Author I'm almost ready to order my new system, but I have some questions left. I already have a Spinpoint F3 1tb and a WD black 640gb sata2. I need a larger disk for storage and am going to use the Spinpoint for that. Then I will be using my WD black 640gb for win7 and programs, so I need a new one for FSX. Shoul I get a 1tb WD caviar black sata3 or a 120gb SSD for FSX? And finally I cant really decide if to get the 2500k or 2600k. I know HT is useless for FSX but I'm thinking about those 2 extra mb of cache... Some people are saying the extra cache is good for FSX. I don't think there is any FPS difference but maybe the extra cache is usefull for making FSX a bit smoother?And I have already decided to get the GTX 570 over a GTX 560ti.
August 19, 201114 yr I have decided not to get an SSD with my new i5 2500k powered PC. I really don't think that I need one. Christopher Low AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU / 64GB DDR5-6000 RAM / 12GB Nvidia RTX 4070 Super GPU / Gigabyte X870E Aorus Elite Wifi 7 / 1+2TB Samsung Evo Plus M2 Nvme UK2000 Beta Tester
August 20, 201114 yr Author Can I use an SSD for fsx and a HDD for win7 at the same time? Do I then have to use AHCI for the HDD as well, and how does HDDs perform with sata mode AHCI?
Create an account or sign in to comment