April 5, 201214 yr I've been a devout MSFS user since 1998 and since the release of Microsoft Flight have started thinking about switching over to XPlane 10. I'll probably switch over when they (developers) start putting good quality aircraft and scenery up.Today though I was wondering I have the Saitek Pro Flight yoke system, multi panel, radio panel, and another throttle quadrant, will those work in XPlane if I were to switch over. Devin Mack "Why yes I do sit up in trees and watch airplanes land in my free time, do you have any better suggestions for my weekend?"
April 5, 201214 yr Yes, there are drivers and plugins for the radio panel and multi-panel that work fine in XPX. The pro-flight instrument panel is not functioning yet. The yoke and throttle quad work fine. I have the Saitek yoke and quadrant, the radio panel and the pro-flight instrument panel, only the instrument panel doesnt work fully...yet.
April 5, 201214 yr Author Alright thank you Devin Mack "Why yes I do sit up in trees and watch airplanes land in my free time, do you have any better suggestions for my weekend?"
April 5, 201214 yr @ PingPong PingPong, can you compare the Saitek yoke with the CH Products yokes? I currently use the CH Flight Sim Yoke, but have had it for a long time, and thinking about getting a new yoke. I have had excellent service with the CH. But wondering if the Saitek yoke is better, or not. I also have the Saitek X52 stick and throttle, which works well also. I do favor yokes for most of my type of flying,(GA mostly). Of course I don't know if you have had experience with CH, but thought I would ask. Donald E. Donovan Flying is the 2nd greatest thrill known to man The 1st is landing.
April 5, 201214 yr Author I could answer that one for you, In our aviation lab at my school we have ch yokes and pedals. Personally I think the saitek yoke, while not the best on the market, is much better than the ch yoke. The yoke handle doesen't flex like the ch one does, and the stainless steel shaft and bearing system of the saitek yoke is much smoother. The only thing you'll lose from the ch is the trim wheel, which i didn't like anyways. Also if youre going to set up the yoke as if you were sitting on the left side of the airplane (with the throttle quadrant to the right) youll have your hat switch on the left side of the yoke which i like. It gives you the ability to look around, control the airplane, and manage the throttles, mixture, etc. all at once. You also get a chronometer which is nice. Devin Mack "Why yes I do sit up in trees and watch airplanes land in my free time, do you have any better suggestions for my weekend?"
April 5, 201214 yr Howdy Devin, Thanks for the input, I wouldn't miss the so called trim wheel in the CH either, I only use it to make sure the pitch is centered when I calibrate the yoke. The hat switch would be handier on the left and if I get the Saitek, I will get the Saitek trim wheel as well. I'm thinking strongly of the Saitek presently, your mini review helps. Thanks again. Donald E. Donovan Flying is the 2nd greatest thrill known to man The 1st is landing.
April 6, 201214 yr Author My pleasure also if you were to get the multi panel it comes with a trim wheel as well I like it a lot Devin Mack "Why yes I do sit up in trees and watch airplanes land in my free time, do you have any better suggestions for my weekend?"
April 6, 201214 yr You can always download the demo first and try your stuff out before you purchase,The Demo hooked me. 100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc Patrick
April 6, 201214 yr I have Saitek yoke, pedals, and quad, and everything works great with XP10. When I first tried using it I struggled with the hat switch and was frustrated that it didn't seem to work as well as it did on FSX, but then I discovered mouse/cmd mode, lol, and once adjusted to that who cares about the hat switch B) In fact, NOW the problem I have is when I fly FSX I constantly find myself trying to use XP keys and wishing they worked. I still think the radial knob interface in like PMDG on FSX is superior to XP10, and I hope it changes eventually, but its a minor nuisance I can live with. I am really happy to have both sims to fly with, in fact its FS9 that has dropped from sight for me, I now spend time between these two instead. Good luck! Jack F. Vogel, Delta Virtual Airlines
April 6, 201214 yr @ wb5okj I have owned both yolks and I feel the Saitek is superior to the CH, if only for the metal shaft that the yolk actuates on, it feels much more substantial that the plastic one in the CH products. With regards to a trim wheel, I actually bought a separate trim wheel from a guy who sells home-crafted USB hardware and have not touched anything else since. I also have both Saitek and CH pedals, they are pretty much equivocal but the Saitek ones have a little more pushback and therefore may be a little better. I also have the CH throttle quadrant, and after a year of use the controls became very twitchy and send alot of unnecessary inputs to the sim. I had to move some of the controls around and ditch the levers I was using for throttle all togehter to have a better sense of realism. I FSUIPC or something similar ever comes to XPX it'll be a godsend because I would like to adjust the sensitivity of my controls independently as opposed to all at once. My trim wheels is really sensitive, so I was thinking of getting this: http://www.saitek.com/uk/prod/trimwheel.html hope that helps...
April 6, 201214 yr How hard is it to push on the Saitek yoke? My main complaint about the CH Eclipse is that it's a bit tough to push/pull sometimes. It makes it hard to fine-tune altitude. The trim wheel does help a bit, though. Also, does the Saitek yoke still have trouble with spontaneous un-calibration or unexpected input from toggles/switches?
April 6, 201214 yr The Saitek yolk is not very hard to move around, but it does snap back into a neutral position when you release it, which makes a trim wheel or some other device necessary. I think the switch bug was cleared in the newer versions of the yolk or drivers, I haven't heard much about it recently.
April 6, 201214 yr I would've bought X Plane 10 a while ago, but I hate it when I have to develop my own control mappings. That's the reason why I'm not buying it. Alex Leung Aerospace Engineering Undergraduate Glider & Private Pilot via Royal Canadian Air Cadets
April 6, 201214 yr I would've bought X Plane 10 a while ago, but I hate it when I have to develop my own control mappings. That's the reason why I'm not buying it. You don't have to "develop" any mappings, its dirt simple really, there's a pull down menu for setup, you go to the joystick/controller selection (forget the exact name but its obvious), once there you click any button or move any axis of your controller and there will be one of the bars that move, then you have a pull down on that device and you pick what you want it to be (eg throttle, mixture, flaps, etc etc). Its easier to do than FSX, its just that its different, there's ALWAYS a first time for a new product... It silly to let this be what keeps you from the product. Jack F. Vogel, Delta Virtual Airlines
April 6, 201214 yr That's not the problem. The problem is that I don't actually want to select what I want that control to be. I want X Plane to auto-select what it wants to be. The amount of choices it has causes me to spin my head because I'm so confused. Alex Leung Aerospace Engineering Undergraduate Glider & Private Pilot via Royal Canadian Air Cadets
Create an account or sign in to comment