August 30, 201213 yr So I'm stable at 4.7ghz at 1.35v (shows running at 1.36 in system). Max temps after running the sim for a while are in the upper seventies, although average temps are at least 10 degrees less. I'm pretty sure I shouldn't push it any harder, but I'm interested if anyone has a different opinion. BTW I've got a Hyper 212 EVO in push pull with 4 case fans.
August 30, 201213 yr Upper 70's in FSX is pretty high but if it's the most demanding thing your computer does then it's fine. You could shave quite a bit off those temps if you replace the stock thermal interface material under the integrated heatspreader, that would allow you to OC further if you desire. More performance is always better, but I don't know how much further you can take Ivy Bridge on air cooling.
August 30, 201213 yr I think 4.7 with IB is excellent! I'd stay there... or even go a little lower... try to get the temps to stop @ high sixties when running FSX | My Liveries | FAA ZMP | PPL ASEL | | Windows 11 | MSI Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K 4.7GHz | MSI RTX 4080 | 64GB 6000 MHz DDR5 | 500GB Samsung 860 Evo SSD | 2x 2TB Samsung 970 Evo M.2 | EVGA 850W Gold | Corsair 5000X | HP G2 (VR) / LG 27" 1440p |
August 30, 201213 yr I'd back off to 4.5GHz and leave it there 24/7. You should be able to pull that off with 1.33v or so, given what you've achieved so far. You'll notice that the +4.5GHz proverbial lemon isn't worth the squeeze as far as FSX performance goes. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Zachary Waddell -- Caravan Driver -- Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/zwaddell Avsim ToS Avsim Screenshot Rules
August 30, 201213 yr Max temps after running the sim for a while are in the upper seventies, Those temperatures are a bit steep. I would take that OC and Voltage down until your temps are a bit lower.
August 30, 201213 yr I'd back off to 4.5GHz and leave it there 24/7. You should be able to pull that off with 1.33v or so, given what you've achieved so far. You'll notice that the +4.5GHz proverbial lemon isn't worth the squeeze as far as FSX performance goes. Dirty lies! 5GHz or bust! :lol:
August 31, 201213 yr Dirty lies! 5GHz or bust! :lol: Hahaha I think that the FPS boost at 5GHZ is more mental than real. :lol:
August 31, 201213 yr Dirty lies! 5GHz or bust! :lol: Lol. Hahaha I think that the FPS boost at 5GHZ is more mental than real. :lol: I found it hard to knock my macho attitude when it comes to PC hardware. I finally did, and I've got FSX right where I want it. I started out pushing for 5 no questions asked. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Zachary Waddell -- Caravan Driver -- Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/zwaddell Avsim ToS Avsim Screenshot Rules
August 31, 201213 yr It's just the max temp it hit was upper 70's. The avg is upper 60's. I'm liking the performance a lot at 4.7! Hard to back down down, but I don't think I'll go any higher. Oh and I made the switch to Prepar3d! I would encourage folks to do the same. While it's not a drastic change, there is an improved performance.
August 31, 201213 yr He has a 212 Evo ($30) cooler and has pushed it to 4.7Ghz..What was that about IB doesn't OC well? LOL I would say that is better than 5.0 on the SB. Manny Beta tester for SIMStarter
August 31, 201213 yr Hahaha I think that the FPS boost at 5GHZ is more mental than real. :lol: There's a real boost, it's not night and day but hey, the performance is there to be had so I'll take it.
August 31, 201213 yr Another 100MHz or 200MHz not going to gain much in frame rate. Unless you can affort frying your CPU, stay where you are or less. Or invest in better cooling and gain a more substantial amount of MHz.
Create an account or sign in to comment