December 31, 200520 yr >The gold standard for 737s is of course the Dreamfleet>737-400>> Now that is news..>>>[h4]Randy J. Smith[/h4]>AMD 64 4000+|ASUS K8V DELUXE|SAPPHIRE ATI X800XT PE|MUNCHKIN>3200|80 gig SATA|DELL 1905FP 19" LCD|TRACKir PRO|PFC JEPPESEN>MOONEY YOKE|CH PRO PEDALS|No it's not :-)Andrew Brownhttp://www.crazypilots.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
December 31, 200520 yr I cannot find a link to their support forum on their website. Is it accessible by non-purchasers? And if so a link please.Thanks in advance.Bob... Bob Prince
December 31, 200520 yr I also agree that this 737 is severly lacking in several key areas: autopilot issues that persist after the service update, the weather radar (as mentioned already), the "non-manual" manual, and frame rates, which are lower for me than on the Level-D 767 (which has to be at least as complex an aircraft, if not more). I purchased the Wilco 737 and the Level-D 767 aircraft on the same day, and man did the differences in quality really stand out. I do realize that the Level-D 767 has been around for a while now and undergone a few updates, so maybe there is hope for this 737 yet. Only time will tell, but for the moment, I am happily simming in "767 land" (and now with Paul Golding's update of the Dreamfleet 727, will soon be in "727 land" as well!)Paul BakemanMechanicsville, VA
December 31, 200520 yr >>True they are harsh words but i'm sick of us the customers>>being beta testers we the customer deserve better like>>Dreamfleets 727 i got that a couple of weeks after its>release>>and found it to be perfect Dreamfleet must of tested it>before>>selling it theres a good idea>>May I recommend a little punctuation? :-)>>http://online.vatsimindicators.net/916312/3.png>No you may not Get a life
January 1, 200620 yr I do not own Wilco's 737 but I do another Feelthere-developed product. I do own the other payware products mentioned in these posts. As I read through the postings, I get the feeling that some feel cheated that Wilco's 737 isn't as good as another product they may own from a different developer. That sense of disatisfaction is channeled into a posting trying to discourage others from purchasing, or hoping that the developers would read the posting and make their product more "comparable" with the other products mentioned. After all, if the other guys released a products that performs such and such, why couldn't everyone? Perhasps what we see is the difference in developer abilities based on what they know. I'm sure FeelThere doesn't mean to produce an inferior product, but the best they can product based on their team's abilities. And that for them may be good enough.Hope all payware developers continue developing and improving their abilities in 2006.Have fun.Dave Vega dv Win 10 Pro || i7-8700K || 32GB || ASUS Z370-P MB || NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11Gb || 2 960 PRO 1TB, 840 EVO My Files in the AVSIM Library
January 1, 200620 yr You need some manners, pal. If you complain about FPS, then get the latest patch and stop comparing apples with oranges and drop the condecending attitude. Virtually no add-on is perfect right out of the box. Sad, but true and fact. The PMDG 747 was even worse upon launch and is now nearly perfect.
January 1, 200620 yr Commercial Member Well put Dave. Intel i9-12900KF, Asus Prime Z690-A MB, 64GB DDR5 6000 RAM, (3) SK hynix M.2 SSD (2TB ea.), 16TB Seagate HDD, Gigabyte GeForce 5080 RTX, Corsair iCUE H70i AIO Liquid Cooler, UHD/Blu-ray Player/Burner (still have lots of CDs, DVDs!) Windows 10, (hold off for now on Win11), EVGA 1300W PSUNetgear 1Gbps modem & router, (3) 27" 1440 wrap-around displaysFull array of Bravo, Saitek and GoFlight hardware for the cockpit. Varjo and HP VR headsets for mixed reality.
January 1, 200620 yr >>>True they are harsh words but i'm sick of us the customers>>>being beta testers we the customer deserve better like>>>Dreamfleets 727 i got that a couple of weeks after its>>release>>>and found it to be perfect Dreamfleet must of tested it>>before>>>selling it theres a good idea>>>>May I recommend a little punctuation? :-)>>>>http://online.vatsimindicators.net/916312/3.png>>>>No you may not >>Get a lifeI have a life thank you. Most of it involves teaching English which is why it saddens me to see my language so badly used. Prehaps you're not a native English user, in which case I shouldn't have critisised your poor writing skills and apologise to you for any offence. Happy New Year :-)http://online.vatsimindicators.net/916312/3.png Gavin Barbara Over 10 years here and AVSIM is still my favourite FS site :-)
January 2, 200620 yr Paul,Pears and apples you are comparing here.The LDS is the only very complex product with last generation gauges that has a minimal effect on CPU load. Any PMDG jet is way more demanding in terms of any computer component. Every FT product (jets) is the opposite, from the CRJ to the ERJ and now this 737, they all eat up your PC. They are the most demanding ACs you can install in your PC (together with some other new products) I mention this because everyone should know what you they are getting into when buying from a known developer, even the bad manuals (probably you don't have the ERJ, which is pretty complicated and the manual is a total joke), the "0" support, like with the CRJ, and the kind of demand on PC load.Leo
Create an account or sign in to comment