Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, 

I'm looking to upgrade my pc, I have one 256gb SSD(windows on it) and one 2 TB HDD. My P3dv4.2 is on the HDD so I want him to load faster and I'm considering buying a 500gb SSD OR Intel optane 32gb with my current 2 tb HHD. I don't know which option is the best if someone can give any advice on this it will be appreciated.

I know that I won't get any better fps but it will load faster and this what I'm looking for. 

My specs

MSI infinite A pre build pc ,I7 7700, 16gb DDR4, GTX 1080 (  Fyi my motherboard is optane ready)

Thanks

Posted

I upgraded recently but found the optane option just way too expensive. I went for the Samsung 960 EVO M.2, with PCIe protocol.  These drives are 6 times faster as an ordinary SSD and affordable. You will need an M.2 slot on your motherboard, but all recent boards should have them.

AMD 7 7700X, 32GB DDR5, GTX1080, 2 x Samsung 1TB NVMe, 1 x 3TB sata SSD, Windows 11 Prof

Posted
1 hour ago, willy647 said:

 You will need an M.2 slot on your motherboard, but all recent boards should have them.

Indeed. However, mine has only one, which I use for the system M.2-SSD booting the machine lightning quick indeed. At some point I would like to exchange one of my flightsim SSDs by a larger M.2, too.  Is there any option for doing so? (I guess not, but who knows.)

Kind regards, Michael

MSFS, Beta tester of Simdocks, SPAD.neXt, and FS-FlightControl

Intel i7-13700K / AsRock Z790 / Crucial 32 GB DDR 5 / ASUS RTX 4080OC 16GB / BeQuiet ATX 1000W / WD m.2 NVMe 2TB (System) / WD m.2 NVMe 4 TB (MSFS) / WD HDD 10 TB / XTOP+Saitek hardware panel /  LG 34UM95 3440 x 1440  / HP Reverb 1 (2160x2160 per eye) / Win 11

Posted
11 hours ago, Alexandre6463 said:

My P3dv4.2 is on the HDD so I want him to load faster and I'm considering buying a 500gb SSD OR Intel optane 32gb with my current 2 tb HHD.

Note that (unless things have changed recently) Optane is only supported on Windows 10 64-bit, only with Intel seventh-generation processors and higher and ONLY for the primary/boot volume. It will do nothing for your secondary HDD. See https://www.anandtech.com/show/11227/intel-launches-optane-memory-m2-cache-ssds-for-client-market

i7-14700k | Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F Gaming WIFI | 32GB DDR5 RAM | MSI RTX 4080 Super | WD Black SN850X 1TB & 2TB | Corsair HX1000i ATX3.0 | MSI MAG401QR 40" monitor | Win 11 Pro 64-bit | Meta Quest 3

Posted
7 hours ago, willy647 said:

I upgraded recently but found the optane option just way too expensive. I went for the Samsung 960 EVO M.2, with PCIe protocol.  These drives are 6 times faster as an ordinary SSD and affordable. You will need an M.2 slot on your motherboard, but all recent boards should have them.

I know about the M.2 but after reading and research the problem with them is the overheat .

 

2 hours ago, vortex681 said:

Note that (unless things have changed recently) Optane is only supported on Windows 10 64-bit, only with Intel seventh-generation processors and higher and ONLY for the primary/boot volume. It will do nothing for your secondary HDD. See https://www.anandtech.com/show/11227/intel-launches-optane-memory-m2-cache-ssds-for-client-market

I didn't know about that I thought that we were able to select the secondary HDD instead. 

Posted
6 hours ago, pmb said:

Indeed. However, mine has only one, which I use for the system M.2-SSD booting the machine lightning quick indeed. At some point I would like to exchange one of my flightsim SSDs by a larger M.2, too.  Is there any option for doing so? (I guess not, but who knows.)

Kind regards, Michael

No slots available on the MB ? No problem, there are solutions available like this one

https://www.kingston.com/us/ssd/consumer/SKC1000

 

AMD 7 7700X, 32GB DDR5, GTX1080, 2 x Samsung 1TB NVMe, 1 x 3TB sata SSD, Windows 11 Prof

Posted
6 minutes ago, willy647 said:

No slots available on the MB ? No problem, there are solutions available like this one

https://www.kingston.com/us/ssd/consumer/SKC1000

Thanks, good to know.

And, btw., my M.2-SSD didn't overheat either so far (1.5 yrs).

Kind regards, Michael

MSFS, Beta tester of Simdocks, SPAD.neXt, and FS-FlightControl

Intel i7-13700K / AsRock Z790 / Crucial 32 GB DDR 5 / ASUS RTX 4080OC 16GB / BeQuiet ATX 1000W / WD m.2 NVMe 2TB (System) / WD m.2 NVMe 4 TB (MSFS) / WD HDD 10 TB / XTOP+Saitek hardware panel /  LG 34UM95 3440 x 1440  / HP Reverb 1 (2160x2160 per eye) / Win 11

Posted

I'm not really sure how Optane memory will actually help a flight sim.  I don't think it helps rendering graphics or anything, and the sim doesn't use HDD much once it's loaded.  I just can't really see where the performance gain will be seen with a sim, since it essentially "stores" and combines memory types for faster access.  I don't think there are any bottlenecks with HDD/RAM access in any of the 64 bit sims.  It might be able to store scenery better so it generates quicker, but that would be the only advantage I can see (and even that is hypothetical)

I'd be curious to know if there are any actual advantage from someone in the know, but that's just my take from researching Optane some time ago for a non-sim related upgrade on my sim.  My takeaway was Optane was great for heavy multitasking, but not advantageous for gaming or simming in general.  I could be way off here, but would welcome correction if I am

Posted

The Samsung drives come with "Samsung Magician" software to keep an eye on the drive status. Sofar I have not seen any warning re temperature.

Maybe the advantage for simming is not that great, but if you are in the market for an upgrade I think you should pass SSD drives and spent just a liitle more for M.2 technology. I also use photoshop and there I can see a real improvement in loading/saving large pictures.

 

AMD 7 7700X, 32GB DDR5, GTX1080, 2 x Samsung 1TB NVMe, 1 x 3TB sata SSD, Windows 11 Prof

Posted
17 hours ago, willy647 said:

I think you should pass SSD drives and spent just a liitle more for M.2 technology. I also use photoshop and there I can see a real improvement in loading/saving large pictures.

It's worth noting that there are different types of M.2 SSDs and that the M.2 SATA drives have no performance advantage over standard SATA SSDs. NVMe PCIe M.2 SSDs provide by far the best performance but come with a correspondingly higher price tag. See https://mybroadband.co.za/news/hardware/209266-what-you-need-to-know-before-you-buy-an-ssd.html for more information.

i7-14700k | Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F Gaming WIFI | 32GB DDR5 RAM | MSI RTX 4080 Super | WD Black SN850X 1TB & 2TB | Corsair HX1000i ATX3.0 | MSI MAG401QR 40" monitor | Win 11 Pro 64-bit | Meta Quest 3

Posted

Exactly. I have a NVMe M.2 SSD, they are directly connected to the PCIe Lanes.

I have reading about 2.3 Gigabyte/s and writing around 1 Gb/s. And still, P3D does not really load faster than from the "normal" SATA SSD...

Yes, the NVMe ones are more expensive... But hey. I would go again for it when building a new machine.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...