Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
mcdonoughdr

P3Dv5 Excessive vRam usage

Recommended Posts

Here I have a server with a 2080 Ti 11 Gb that drives two 4K displays in NvSurround.

Also I have a left view client with a 2080 8 Gb  and one 4K display.

V4.5 is running very well .

I fear that both graphics cards do not have enough memory for V5 to have at least the same detail as in V4.5.

Any suggestions?

  • Like 2

13900 8 cores @ 5.5-5.8 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.3 GHz (hyperthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D4 - GSkill Ripjaws 2x 16 Gb 4266 mhz @ 3200 mhz / cas 13 -  Inno3D RTX4090 X3 iCHILL 24 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Thermaltake Level 10 GT case - EKWB Extreme 240 liquid cooling set push/pull - 2x 55’ Sony 4K tv's as front view and right view.

13600  6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb  - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x  Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - 1x 65” Sony 4K tv as left view.

FOV : 190 degrees

My flightsim vids :  https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0

 

Share this post


Link to post

Bought an RTX 2070 Super a few months ago and it is funny and hard to belive it is too weak for V5 😮

  • Like 3

I7-10700 (4.8 GHz with HT enabled)

2x16GB DDR4 3600MHz 

Gigabyte RTX 2070 Super OC Gaming

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, GSalden said:

Here I have a server with a 2080 Ti 11 Gb that drives two 4K displays in NvSurround.

Also I have a left view client with a 2080 8 Gb  and one 4K display.

V4.5 is running very well .

I fear that both graphics cards do not have enough memory for V5 to have at least the same detail as in V4.5.

Any suggestions?

Buy two Titan RTX's 😆

Share this post


Link to post

This is one of the reasons when Nvidia came out with their new 2080 card I couldn't believe it, only 8GB of VRAM?! We've had 8GB VRAM cards for 5 years or more... being flight simmers we are going to hit that VRAM limit sooner rather than later. 

Edited by CaptainIronside

Share this post


Link to post
11 minutes ago, GSalden said:

Any suggestions?

Wait until it is fixed. Even if it takes a year. That is not a compromise you will want to make.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post

VRAM is not expensive at all.

A 2080 should have had 11 Gb and a 2080 Ti should have had 16 Gb...

A Titan Is 2x the price of a 2080 Ti and perhaps $ 200 more expensive on VRAM !

The way NVidia controls the gaming industry is not always the best for us.. 

  • Like 3

13900 8 cores @ 5.5-5.8 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.3 GHz (hyperthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D4 - GSkill Ripjaws 2x 16 Gb 4266 mhz @ 3200 mhz / cas 13 -  Inno3D RTX4090 X3 iCHILL 24 Gb - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 1Tb - Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Thermaltake Level 10 GT case - EKWB Extreme 240 liquid cooling set push/pull - 2x 55’ Sony 4K tv's as front view and right view.

13600  6 cores @ 5.1 GHz / 8 cores @ 4.0 GHz (hypterthreading on) - Asus ROG Strix Gaming D - GSkill Trident 4x Gb 3200 MHz cas 15 - Asus TUF RTX 4080 16 Gb  - 1x SSD M2 2800/1800 2TB - 2x  Sata 600 SSD 500 Mb - Corsair D4000 Airflow case - NXT Krajen Z63 AIO liquide cooling - 1x 65” Sony 4K tv as left view.

FOV : 190 degrees

My flightsim vids :  https://www.youtube.com/user/fswidesim/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0

 

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, GSalden said:

A Titan Is 2x the price of a 2080 Ti and perhaps $ 200 more expensive on VRAM !

Yes, unfortunately a rip off I know, but probably the only way to beat the VRAM OOM's unless LM provide a fix.

But that will probably mean compromises in visuals which is probably what is causing this - with improvements

comes increased requirements.😏

Share this post


Link to post
3 minutes ago, Caveney737 said:

with improvements comes increased requirements

But this is just ludicrous.

Currently you can't even run it on minimum specs.

Share this post


Link to post
Just now, Farlis said:

But this is just ludicrous.

Currently you can't even run it on minimum specs.

If you are on minimum specs then yes it is ludicrous. If someone was using 6 to 7 Gb in v4

and is now seeing OOM's with 8Gb of VRAM then that is understandable which is what I meant!

Share this post


Link to post
2 minutes ago, Caveney737 said:

If you are on minimum specs then yes it is ludicrous. If someone was using 6 to 7 Gb in v4

and is now seeing OOM's with 8Gb of VRAM then that is understandable which is what I meant!

I have a GTX1660TI with 6 Gigs. Bought it last year together with my Rift S.

Performs adequately in V4, excellent in V5.

But runs out of memory in V5 in no time. With the SAME graphical settings. I did not crank anything up.

Edited by Farlis

Share this post


Link to post
3 minutes ago, Farlis said:

I have a GTX1660TI with 6 Gigs. Bought it last year together with my Rift S.

Performs adequately in V4, excellent in V5.

But runs out of memory in V5 in no time. With the SAME graphical settings. I did not crank anything up.

Do you have the new Atmospheric settings turned on?

Share this post


Link to post
5 minutes ago, Caveney737 said:

Do you have the new Atmospheric settings turned on?

Currently yes. 

That makes indeed a difference of one gig in VRam.

However that is WITH cloud coverage. The OOM's I had were WITHOUT any clouds.

Edited by Farlis

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Farlis said:

Currently yes. 

That makes indeed a difference of one gig in VRam.

Do you know how much VRAM you were using in v4. Maybe that 1 Gb is just enough extra

to push it past the limit of your card. Just a thought - I am no expert. LM are really the ones you

need to complain to, I was just stating an opinion which seems to be a dangerous pastime at the moment🙂

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Caveney737 said:

Do you know how much VRAM you were using in v4. Maybe that 1 Gb is just enough extra

to push it past the limit of your card. Just a thought - I am no expert. LM are really the ones you

need to complain to, I was just stating an opinion which seems to be a dangerous pastime at the moment🙂

In V4 I can go up to about 5.6 before it turns into a stutterfest. V5 only recognizes 5 and says bye bye as soon as I reach 4.9.

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, Farlis said:

In V4 I can go up to about 5.6 before it turns into a stutterfest. V5 only recognizes 5 and says bye bye as soon as I reach 4.9.

I think you 'll find that is because of DX12. It handles VRAM differently and apparently doesn't allocate as much

to p3D as before? Sure I read this somewhere in the Forums. Maybe someone more technical can confirm this.

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...