September 11, 20205 yr Hello,' I am building a new P3D server, I have been reading about the NVME PCIe. Could it be a good idea to get a 1TB NVME to put Windows 10 an other operating items, and leave a couple of SSD's for P3DV5, MSFS 2020 and scenery and other add on files? I also want to know is, since the NVME connects via PCIe, and I am planning on installing an RTX 3090 PCIe card. Would the NVME could potentially slow down the RTX 3090? Thanks Juan Edited September 11, 20205 yr by ducaud
September 11, 20205 yr Why not put FS2020 on a M.2 nvme SSD, and the OS and other applications on a regular SATA III SSD? As far as I know the 3090 PCIe slot doesn't influence the speed of the nvme PCIe port, just make sure your motherboard has enough room for both, as the 3090 alone is already filling the space of three PCIe slots. Btw, it might be a good idea to wait a bit longer with building your system, because the new Ryzen 4000 series CPU will be arriving shortly.. Edited September 11, 20205 yr by stigt Arjen Nederstigt System: Intel Skylake Core i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz / Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Xtreme / Kingston 2x8GB, DDR4, 2666MHz, CL15 Microsoft Windows 10 Home
September 11, 20205 yr It always makes way more sense to install the OS on the fastest drive that you have at the time. The only thing you might benefit from the sim being on a faster drive is slightly better load times. Read your motherboard manual to find out what specific impact your M.2 drives will have on your PCIe bandwidth. i7-13700KF, 32gb DDR4 3200, RTX 4080, Win 11, MSFS 2024
September 11, 20205 yr 5 minutes ago, Dave_YVR said: It always makes way more sense to install the OS on the fastest drive that you have at the time. The only thing you might benefit from the sim being on a faster drive is slightly better load times. Read your motherboard manual to find out what specific impact your M.2 drives will have on your PCIe bandwidth. Do you know if there is any difference in sim performance when the sim is installed on a regular SATA III SSD instead of a nvme SSD ?. I would like to see some comparison tests before building my own system later this year. Arjen Nederstigt System: Intel Skylake Core i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz / Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Xtreme / Kingston 2x8GB, DDR4, 2666MHz, CL15 Microsoft Windows 10 Home
September 11, 20205 yr 2 hours ago, stigt said: Do you know if there is any difference in sim performance when the sim is installed on a regular SATA III SSD instead of a nvme SSD ? There isn't a much difference at all when it comes to NVME and regular SATA speeds for real world usage. I picked up a NVME for my own build earlier this year mostly due to the form factor as opposed to any real performance benefit.
September 11, 20205 yr 6 hours ago, stigt said: Do you know if there is any difference in sim performance when the sim is installed on a regular SATA III SSD instead of a nvme SSD ?. I would like to see some comparison tests before building my own system later this year. No noticeable difference. A SATA III SSD feeds data to the sim faster than it can process it already...the NVME drive is 15+ times faster still, but that doesn't make any difference for the sim. I like NVME because of the physical simplicity--no mounts, no cables, just a small board mounted under a plate on the motherboard. My current build uses Samsung NVME SSDs, and my previous build used Samsung SATA SSDs, and load times are comparable. Bob Scott | President and CEO, AVSIM Inc ATP Gulfstream II-III-IV-V Sys1 (MSFS20+24/XPlane12+11): AMD 9800X3D, water 2x240mm, MSI MPG X670E Carbon, 64GB GSkill 6000/30, nVidia RTX4090FE Alienware AW3821DW 38" 21:9 GSync, 2x4TB Crucial T705 PCIe5 + 2x2TB Samsung 990 SSD, EVGA 1000P2 PSU, 12.9" iPad Pro Thrustmaster TCA Boeing Yoke, TCA Airbus Sidestick, Twin TCA Airbus Throttle quads, PFC Cirrus Pedals, Coolermaster HAF932 case Sys2 (P3Dv5/v4): i9-13900KS, water 2x360mm, ASUS Z790 Hero, 32GB GSkill 7800MHz CAS36, ASUS RTX4090 Samsung 55" JS8500 4K TV@60Hz, 3x 2TB WD SN850X 1x 4TB Crucial P3 M.2 NVME SSD, EVGA 1600T2 PSU Fiber link to Yamaha RX-V467 Home Theater Receiver, Polk/Klipsch 6" bookshelf speakers, Polk 12" subwoofer, 12.9" iPad Pro PFC yoke/throttle quad/pedals with custom Hall sensor retrofit, Thermaltake View 71 case, Stream Deck XL button box Sys3 (DCS/P3Dv4/ATS/ETS): AMD 7800X3D, MSI MPG X870E Carbon, Noctua NH-D15S, 64GB GSkill 6000/30, EVGA RTX3090 Alienware AW3420DW 34" 21:9 GSync, Corsair HX1000i PSU, 4TB Crucial T705 PCIe5 + 2TB Samsung 970Evo Plus, TM TCA Officer Pack, Saitek combat pedals, TM Warthog, TM RS300 FF wheel/pedals, Coolermaster HAF XB case
September 11, 20205 yr 3 hours ago, w6kd said: No noticeable difference. A SATA III SSD feeds data to the sim faster than it can process it already...the NVME drive is 15+ times faster still, but that doesn't make any difference for the sim. I like NVME because of the physical simplicity--no mounts, no cables, just a small board mounted under a plate on the motherboard. My current build uses Samsung NVME SSDs, and my previous build used Samsung SATA SSDs, and load times are comparable. Thx for the answer, was indeed planning on using two M.2 nvme SSD’s for my build to have less clutter in my case. Arjen Nederstigt System: Intel Skylake Core i7 6700K @ 4.0GHz / Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 Xtreme / Kingston 2x8GB, DDR4, 2666MHz, CL15 Microsoft Windows 10 Home
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.