Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just curious what most of you are using for a display size.  I am thinking of upgrading from my 34" Ultrawide Dell since it is about 6 years old.  I'd like to go bigger, but I don't know if that will hurt performance at all and not look much better.  I have the space for up to a 49" but can go anywhere between that and 34".  I like the curved look.  Currently I am running 3440x1440 at 60hz but wasn't sure if my hardware could handle bigger and better.  Thanks!


Intel Core i7 12700K (5.0GHz Max Boost Clock) 12-Core CPU   32GB G.Skill Performance DDR4 SDRAM 3600MHz       Graphics Processor:12GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, GDDR6x System   2TB Western Digital, NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The size of your display has no effect on MSFS performance. The resolution you select, however, does affect performance. I personally use a 75" Sony 4K TV for my display. A 4K TV works great with MSFS, even if you set the Render Scale somewhat below 4K as I do. There are generally fewer options for refresh rates on TVs than there are on dedicated monitors. But this issue has never bothered me, since I lock my MSFS fps to my TV refresh rate, which works out to a solid and quite acceptable 30fps.


Processor: Intel i9-13900KF 5.8GHz 24-Core, Graphics Processor: Nvidia RTX 4090 24GB GDDR6, System Memory: 64GB High Performance DDR5 SDRAM 5600MHz, Operating System: Windows 11 Home Edition, Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX, LGA 1700, CPU Cooling: Corsair H100i Elite 240mm Liquid Cooling, RGB and LCD Display, Chassis Fans: Corsair Low Decibel, Addressable RGB Fans, Power Supply: Corsair HX1000i Fully Modular Ultra-Low-Noise Platinum ATX 1000 Watt, Primary Storage: 2TB Samsung Gen 4 NVMe SSD, Secondary Storage: 1TB Samsung Gen 4 NVMe SSD, VR Headset: Meta Quest 2, Primary Display: SONY 4K Bravia 75-inch, 2nd Display: SONY 4K Bravia 43-inch, 3rd Display: Vizio 28-inch, 1920x1080. Controller: Xbox Controller attached to PC via USB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you go to a 4K monitor and run the game at native 4K you would be driving 3840x2160 pixels instead of 3440x1440 so expect an FPS drop if you leave everything else the same.  You probably will lose about 30% but likely can get that back with tweaking.

Edited by Glenn Fitzpatrick

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Glenn Fitzpatrick said:

If you go to a 4K monitor you would be driving 3840x2160 pixels

That assumes Render Scaling is set to 100. I set mine to 60, which generates an actual resolution of 2304 x 1296 for better performance.


Processor: Intel i9-13900KF 5.8GHz 24-Core, Graphics Processor: Nvidia RTX 4090 24GB GDDR6, System Memory: 64GB High Performance DDR5 SDRAM 5600MHz, Operating System: Windows 11 Home Edition, Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX, LGA 1700, CPU Cooling: Corsair H100i Elite 240mm Liquid Cooling, RGB and LCD Display, Chassis Fans: Corsair Low Decibel, Addressable RGB Fans, Power Supply: Corsair HX1000i Fully Modular Ultra-Low-Noise Platinum ATX 1000 Watt, Primary Storage: 2TB Samsung Gen 4 NVMe SSD, Secondary Storage: 1TB Samsung Gen 4 NVMe SSD, VR Headset: Meta Quest 2, Primary Display: SONY 4K Bravia 75-inch, 2nd Display: SONY 4K Bravia 43-inch, 3rd Display: Vizio 28-inch, 1920x1080. Controller: Xbox Controller attached to PC via USB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes 2304 x 1296 is 4K render scaled by 60%.  

If you were previously running 3440x1440 60% you were actually running  at 2304 x 864 after 60% render scale.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to have a similar Dell 34 and upgraded a couple years ago to a Samsung 49" Ultrawide curved (5120 x 1440).  Probably the best  thing I have ever bought for simming...it would work great with your 3080ti.  I was running it on a 1080ti up until 6 months ago when I did a new PC build....running a 3080ti now as well.

  • Like 1

Eric

i9-12900k, RTX 3080ti FTW, 32GB ddr5 5600 RAM, 2TB 980 Pro SSD, H100i AIO, Samsung CRG90 49", Win 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Flic1 said:

I used to have a similar Dell 34 and upgraded a couple years ago to a Samsung 49" Ultrawide curved (5120 x 1440).  Probably the best  thing I have ever bought for simming...it would work great with your 3080ti.  I was running it on a 1080ti up until 6 months ago when I did a new PC build....running a 3080ti now as well.

What type of summing do you do?  I fly the Fenix and wonder how that would look or if it would be a good fit for VFR only. 


Intel Core i7 12700K (5.0GHz Max Boost Clock) 12-Core CPU   32GB G.Skill Performance DDR4 SDRAM 3600MHz       Graphics Processor:12GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, GDDR6x System   2TB Western Digital, NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Zimmerbz said:

What type of summing do you do?  I fly the Fenix and wonder how that would look or if it would be a good fit for VFR only.

Mostly the Fenix 320 and PMDG.  Gives a great view of the VC....


Eric

i9-12900k, RTX 3080ti FTW, 32GB ddr5 5600 RAM, 2TB 980 Pro SSD, H100i AIO, Samsung CRG90 49", Win 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a 55” TV at 4K.  It’s awesome.


Dave

Current System (Running at 4k): ASUS ROG STRIX X670E-F, Ryzen 7800X3D, RTX 4080, 55" Samsung Q80T, 32GB DDR5 6000 RAM, EVGA CLC 280mm AIO Cooler, HP Reverb G2, Brunner CLS-E NG Yoke, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS & Stick, Thrustmaster TCA Quadrant & Add-on, VirtualFly Ruddo+, TQ6+ and Yoko+, GoFlight MCP-PRO and EFIS, Skalarki FCU and MCDU

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Zimmerbz said:

Just curious what most of you are using for a display size.  I am thinking of upgrading from my 34" Ultrawide Dell since it is about 6 years old.  I'd like to go bigger, but I don't know if that will hurt performance at all and not look much better.  I have the space for up to a 49" but can go anywhere between that and 34".  I like the curved look.  Currently I am running 3440x1440 at 60hz but wasn't sure if my hardware could handle bigger and better.  Thanks!

Hi Zimmer, 

I also had the 34" U3415W, and a 3080Ti.  Right now your CPU and GPU are quite well matched--think about this when you consider the ideas below.  Here are some things to grapple with as you make your decision:

  • At the same pixel resolution, the larger the screen, the farther you need to sit away from it to have the same image quality.  An extreme example to make the point:  we have a 65" 4K TV.  With our viewing distance which is about 10 feet, movies in 4K look no better than at 1080p.   If we moved to 4 feet away, we would likely see some improvement in IQ.
  • A 4K screen has roughly 35% greater demand on VRAM and GPU utilization, and some degree of that on CPU load as well.
  • A 4K screen uses an aspect ratio of 16:9, versus 21:9 for a 3440x1440 resolution display. 
  • If your ultimate goal is ultra smooth performance a display featuring true Gsync can add significant value in this regard.  I upgraded my Dell to an LG 34" curved 3440x1440 Gsync Ultimate (has HDR1000 as well, hence their "Ultimate" label) only to get the Gsync capability.   I sit roughly 30" from my display and always will so there is no value to go to a larger display as I would end up moving it farther from my eyes, and there would be no real benefit.

Noel

System:  7800x3D, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, Noctua NH-U12A, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Edge Sync for near zero Frame Time Variance achieving ultra-fluid animation at lower frame rates.

Aircraft used in A Pilot's Life V2:  PMDG 738, Aerosoft CRJ700, FBW A320nx, WT 787X

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm using a 48" LG CX oled hdtv.  I prefer a glossy screen over a matte screen.   Really dislike matte screens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Noel said:

which is about 10 feet, movies in 4K look no better than at 1080p.   If we moved to 4 feet away, we would likely see some improvement in IQ.

Not sure I understand... closer = better IQ? Did you mean 14? Just confused. It's all great info BTW.


[CPL]  I9-9900K @5.0GHz HT ON, Maximus XI Hero, ASUS TUF RTX4080 OC, 32GB DDR4 3200 14, 1TB NVMe SSD, 500GB SSD, 1TB HDD, 40" Samsung 4K TV, Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Logitech Rudder Pedals, WIN11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bbuckley said:

Not sure I understand... closer = better IQ? Did you mean 14? Just confused. It's all great info BTW.

Better Image Quallity.  Put another way, the closer we are to the screen the easier it is to see the difference between a 1080p screen and a 4K screen.   


Noel

System:  7800x3D, Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, Noctua NH-U12A, MSI Pro 650-P WiFi, G.SKILL Ripjaws S5 Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin PC RAM DDR5 6000, WD NVMe 2Tb x 1, Sabrent NVMe 2Tb x 1, RTX 4090 FE, Corsair RM1000W PSU, Win11 Home, LG Ultra Curved Gsync Ultimate 3440x1440, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Case, TCA Boeing Edition Yoke & TQ, Cessna Trim Wheel, RTSS Framerate Limiter w/ Edge Sync for near zero Frame Time Variance achieving ultra-fluid animation at lower frame rates.

Aircraft used in A Pilot's Life V2:  PMDG 738, Aerosoft CRJ700, FBW A320nx, WT 787X

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Noel said:

Better Image Quallity.  Put another way, the closer we are to the screen the easier it is to see the difference between a 1080p screen and a 4K screen.   

Oh, ok I think I understand, thanks. I see now that you mean that comparing two 65" TVs, one at 4K and one at 1080p, at 10' you wouldn't notice the difference but at 4' you would likely see that the 4K is better IQ. But comparing two 4K TVs, one 65" and one 40", your viewing distance needs to be farther away for the 65" to get the same IQ. I use a 4K 40" TV and sit with eyepoint ~36". If I went larger, I'd have to move back further.


[CPL]  I9-9900K @5.0GHz HT ON, Maximus XI Hero, ASUS TUF RTX4080 OC, 32GB DDR4 3200 14, 1TB NVMe SSD, 500GB SSD, 1TB HDD, 40" Samsung 4K TV, Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Logitech Rudder Pedals, WIN11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A completely different consideration is if you desire a real life sized field of view from your setup. To achieve this, you need a large screen (55" plus). Based on my magnification settings and distance from my monitor, instruments and objects appear close to their correct real world size in my sim. 

  • Like 2

13900K@5.8GHz - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR  HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...